ノーマルビュー

Google Plots Big Expansion in India as US Restricts Visas

著者:msmash
2026年2月4日 04:02

🤖 AI Summary

**要約(日本語)**

Alphabet(Google の親会社)は、インド・バンガロールのホワイトフィールドにある Alembic City で、総面積約 240 万平方フィート(約 2.2 万㎡)のオフィススペースを確保しようとしている。

- 現在、1棟のオフィスビルをリースし、残り2棟についてはオプション契約を取得。
- 最初のビルは数か月以内に社員が入居でき、残りの2棟は来年完成予定。
- すべてのスペースを活用すれば、最大で約 2 万人の追加雇用が可能となり、インドでの従業員数は現在の約 1.4 万人から倍以上に拡大できる見込み。

この拡大計画は、米国のトランプ政権下でのビザ制限が厳しくなり、外国人タレントを米国内に呼び込むことが難しくなったことが背景にある。米国企業は人材確保のためにインドなど海外での採用を強化しており、特に人工知能(AI)分野での競争が激化している。

要点:
- Alphabet がバンガロールで大規模オフィス拡張(最大 2 万人増員)を計画。
- 米国のビザ規制が厳化したため、インドでの採用・拠点強化が加速。
- AI 人材確保が拡大の主な動機となっている。
Alphabet is plotting to dramatically expand its presence in India [non-paywalled source], with the possibility of taking millions of square feet in new office space in Bangalore, India's tech hub. From a report: Google's parent company has leased one office tower and purchased options on two others in Alembic City, a development in the Whitefield tech corridor, totaling 2.4 million square feet, according to people familiar with the deal. The first tower is expected to open to employees in the coming months, while construction on the remaining two is set to conclude next year. Options in the real estate industry give would-be tenants the exclusive right to rent, or in some cases buy, a property at a predetermined price within a specific time frame. It's also possible Alphabet will not exercise the option to use the additional towers. If it does take all of the space, the complex could accommodate as many as 20,000 additional staff, which could more than double the company's footprint in India, said the people, asking not to be identified because the plans aren't public. Alphabet currently employs around 14,000 in the country, out of a global workforce of roughly 190,000. [...] US President Donald Trump's visa restrictions have made it harder to bring foreign talent to America, prompting some companies to recruit more staff overseas. India has become an increasingly important place for US companies to hire, particularly in the race to dominate artificial intelligence.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Gemini In Google Calendar Now Helps You Find the Best Meeting Time For All Attendees

著者:BeauHD
2026年1月27日 08:00

🤖 AI Summary

**Google カレンダーに Gemini 搭載の「おすすめ時間」機能が追加**

- **自動スキャンで最適時間を提示**
Gemini が参加者全員のカレンダーを解析し、空き時間・勤務時間・既存の予定衝突を考慮した「おすすめ時間」を自動で表示。手動でスケジュールを照合する手間が不要になる。

- **一括再調整が簡単**
複数の参加者が招待を辞退した場合、イベント画面に全員が空いている時間帯がバナーで提示され、ワンクリックで招待日時を変更できる。

- **対象と展開スケジュール**
対象は Google Workspace の対象プランユーザー。今日から段階的にデフォルトで有効化され、数週間で全 eligible ユーザーに配信される見込み。

この機能により、会議設定の手間が大幅に削減され、スケジュール調整がスムーズになる。
Google is adding Gemini-powered "Suggested times" to Google Calendar, automatically scanning attendees' calendars to surface the best meeting slots based on availability, work hours, and conflicts. The feature also streamlines rescheduling with one-click alternatives when invitees decline. Digital Trends reports: According to a recent post on the Workspace Updates blog, Gemini in Google Calendar can now help you quickly identify optimal meeting times when creating an event, as long as you have access to the attendees' calendars. The new "Suggested times" feature scans everyone's calendars and highlights the best time slots based on availability, working hours, and potential conflicts, eliminating the need to manually check schedules. Google has also made rescheduling simpler. The company explains that if multiple attendees decline your invite, you'll see a banner in the event showing a time when everyone is available, letting you update the invite with a single click. The feature is being rolled out starting today to eligible Workspace tiers. It will be enabled by default and is expected to reach all eligible users over the next few weeks.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Google Discover Replaces News Headlines With Sometimes Inaccurate AI-Generated Alternatives

2026年1月26日 09:04

🤖 AI Summary

Google Discover がニュース記事の見出しを、AI が自動生成したクリックベイト風の文に置き換える機能を本格化させました。Google はこれを「トレンドトピック」としてユーザー満足度が高いと主張していますが、実際には事実と異なる情報や文脈を誤って伝える見出しが多数報告されており、PC Magazine や Ars Technica などの出版者は「誤情報が拡散される」「AI の見出しは信頼できない」と強く批判しています。AI 生成の見出しには「Generated with AI, which can make mistakes」という注意文が「もっと見る」ボタンの裏に隠され、読者に出版社が意図した見出しと誤認させる恐れがあります。Google はインタビューの要請を拒否し、実装の詳細や誤情報防止策については明らかにしていません。
An anonymous reader shared this report from The Verge: In early December, I brought you the news that Google has begun replacing Verge headlines, and those of our competitors, with AI clickbait nonsense in its content feed [which appears on the leftmost homescreen page of many Android phones and the Google app's homepage]. Google appeared to be backing away from the experiment, but now tells The Verge that its AI headlines in Google Discover are a feature, one that "performs well for user satisfaction." I once again see lots of misleading claims every time I check my phone... For example, Google's AI claimed last week that "US reverses foreign drone ban," citing and linking to this PCMag story for the news. That's not just false — PCMag took pains to explain that it's false in the story that Google links to...! What does the author of that PCMag story think? "It makes me feel icky," Jim Fisher tells me over the phone. "I'd encourage people to click on stories and read them, and not trust what Google is spoon-feeding them." He says Google should be using the headline that humans wrote, and if Google needs a summary, it can use the ones that publications already submit to help search engines parse our work. Google claims it's not rewriting headlines. It characterizes these new offerings as "trending topics," even though each "trending topic" presents itself as one of our stories, links to our stories, and uses our images, all without competent fact-checking to ensure the AI is getting them right... The AI is also no longer restricted to roughly four words per headline, so I no longer see nonsense headlines like "Microsoft developers using AI" or "AI tag debate heats." (Instead, I occasionally see tripe like "Fares: Need AAA & AA Games" or "Dispatch sold millions; few avoided romance.") But Google's AI has no clue what parts of these stories are new, relevant, significant, or true, and it can easily confuse one story for another. On December 26th, Google told me that "Steam Machine price & HDMI details emerge." They hadn't. On January 11th, Google proclaimed that "ASUS ROG Ally X arrives." (It arrived in 2024; the new Xbox Ally arrived months ago.) On January 20th, it wrote that "Glasses-free 3D tech wows," introducing readers to "New 3D tech called Immensity from Leia" — but linking to this TechRadar story about an entirely different company called Visual Semiconductor... Google declined our request for an interview to more fully explain the idea. The site Android Police spotted more inaccurate headlines in December: A story from 9to5Google, which was actually titled 'Don't buy a Qi2 25W wireless charger hoping for faster speeds — just get the 'slower' one instead' was retitled as 'Qi2 slows older Pixels.' Similarly, Ars Technica's 'Valve's Steam Machine looks like a console, but don't expect it to be priced like one' was changed to 'Steam Machine price revealed.' At the time, we believed that the inaccuracies were due to the feature being unstable and in early testing.... Now, Google has stopped calling Discover replacing human-written headlines as an "experiment." "Google buries a 'Generated with AI, which can make mistakes' message under the 'See more' button in the summary," reports 9to5Google, "making it look like this is the publisher's intended headline." While it is obvious that Google has refined this feature over the past couple of months, it doesn't take long to still find plenty of misleading headlines throughout Discover... Another article from NotebookCheck about an Anker power bank with a retractable cable was given a headline that's about another product entirely. A pair of headlines from Tom's Hardware and PCMag, meanwhile, show the two sides of using AI for this purpose. The Tom's Hardware headline, "Free GPU & Amazon Scams," isn't representative of the actual article, which is about someone who bought a GPU from Amazon, canceled their order, and the retailer shipped it anyway. There's nothing about "Amazon Scams" in the article.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

❌