ノーマルビュー

Newly Unsealed Records Reveal Amazon's Price-Fixing Tactics

著者: BeauHD
2026年4月18日 01:00

🤖 AI Summary

Amazonがカリフォルニアでの反トラスト訴訟に関連する新規資料をもとに、価格操控行為を行っていた可能性が浮き彫りになりました。これらの資料によると、アマゾンはサードパーティ販売者がウォ爾瑪、ターゲット、ウェイファールなどの競合相手のサイトでの価格を上げることを圧迫しました。これは、アマゾンが最も安価な価格を保有しているという印象を与え、自社商品が低価格で提供されているかのように見せるためです。

裁判では、マイヤー・ハンドラーという服飾会社のオーナーが証言し、2022年10月にアマゾンから出品中の商品が「Buy Box」(購入ボックス)から外れた通知を受け取ったことを明かしました。これは、ハンドラーの会社がアマゾンでは19.99ドルで販売し、ウォル瑪では同じ価格で販売していたことによるものでした。その結果、ハンドラーはウォルマertaでの価格を同様に設定し、「Buy Box」の競争から逃れるために商品コードを変更しました。

また、ペンシルベニア州の園芸品供給業者テリー・エbbenshadeも証言しています。彼は、自分の製品がアマゾンの「Buy Box」から外れたとき、80%近くの売上が減少したことを説明しました。これは、競合他社の価格がアマゾンよりも低かったためとされています。エbbenshadeは、ウェイファールで自社製品をより高値で販売することによって「Buy Box」を再取得することができたと述べています。

これらの証言により、アマゾンの競争優位性を維持するためにサードパーティ販売者に価格操作を行っていた可能性が示唆されています。
Newly unsealed records in California's antitrust case against Amazon allegedly show the company pressured third-party sellers to raise prices on rival sites like Walmart, Target, and Wayfair so Amazon could maintain the appearance of offering the lowest price. California says Amazon used tools like Buy Box suppression to punish cheaper listings elsewhere. The Guardian reports: [...] In one previously redacted deposition, marked "highly confidential," Mayer Handler, owner of a clothing company called Leveret, testified that he received an email in October 2022 from Amazon notifying him that one of his products was "no longer eligible to be a featured offer" through Amazon's Buy Box. The tech giant, he testified, had suppressed the item, a tiger-themed, toddler's pajama set, because his company was selling it for $19.99 on Amazon, a single cent higher than what his company was offering it for on Walmart. Afterwards, Handler testified, his company "changed pricing on Walmart to match or exceed Amazon's price" or changed the item's product code to try to throw off Amazon's price tracking system. In response to a question from the Guardian, Handler criticized Amazon for tracking prices across the internet and "shadow" blocking his company's products -- tactics which he said were depriving consumers of "lower prices." "Maybe that's capitalism," he wrote. "Or that's a monopoly causing price hikes on the consumer." In another unsealed deposition, Terry Esbenshade, a Pennsylvania garden store supplier, testified in October 2024 that whenever his products lost Amazon's Buy Box because of lower prices elsewhere on the internet, his sales on Amazon would plummet by about 80%. This financial reality forced him to try to raise his products' prices with other retailers elsewhere, he said. In one instance, Esbenshade testified, he discovered that one of his company's better-selling patio tables had "become suppressed" on Amazon. Esbenshade wasn't sure why, he recalled, until someone at Amazon suggested he look at Wayfair, another online retailer that happened to be selling his patio table below Amazon's price. The businessman went online and set up a new minimum advertised price for the table on Wayfair to ensure it was higher than Amazon's. "So that raised the price up, and, voila, my product came back" on Amazon, he said, thanks to the reinstatement of the Buy Box.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

❌