ノーマルビュー

Internal Messages May Doom Meta At Social Media Addiction Trial

著者:BeauHD
2026年1月28日 07:02

🤖 AI Summary

**要約(日本語)**

19歳のK.G.M.(仮名)が提起した、ソーシャルメディアの設計がもたらす心理的被害に関する訴訟が、MetaとYouTubeを相手に本格的な審理へと突入した。

- **訴訟の主旨**
- 無限スクロールや自動再生といった機能が、K.G.M.にうつ・不安・自傷・自殺念慮を引き起こしたと主張。
- 損害賠償(懲罰的賠償金を含む)と、プラットフォーム上に子ども・若者へのリスク警告を義務付けることを求めている。

- **他社の動向**
- TikTok と Snapchat は訴訟前に和解済み。
- 現時点で争点となっているのは Meta と YouTube のみ。

- **原告側の課題**
- 「ソーシャルメディア依存」という概念が法的に認められておらず、各プラットフォームの設計がどれだけ被害に寄与したかを具体的に示す必要がある。
- 学術研究はインターネット使用とメンタルヘルスの相関は示すが因果関係は不明確で、訴訟の成立を危うくしている。

- **内部文書のインパクト**
- Tech Oversight Project が公開した、訴訟で封印解除された内部資料には、Meta が「ティーンをロックインさせる」ことを最重要戦略とし、若年層のエンゲージメントをビジネスモデルの中心に据えていたことが記録されている。
- さらに、Meta 社内で「Instagramは薬物のようだ」や「ティーンはオフにできない」などと称賛するメールが見つかり、実際の利用データが「幸福度低下」と相関していることも認められている。

- **専門家の見解**
- 法律専門家は、被害の具体的な因果関係を立証するのが最大のハードルと指摘。
- 一方で、内部メッセージが陪審員に「意図的に依存させる設計」だと印象付ける可能性が高く、判決に大きく影響する可能性がある。

**結論**
Meta と YouTube が子ども・ティーン向けに「中毒性」を意図的に組み込んだという内部証拠が明らかになることで、同社の法的責任が問われる可能性が高まっている。訴訟は、ソーシャルメディア依存という概念を法制度に取り入れるかどうかという、今後のデジタルプラットフォーム規制の重要な転換点になると見られている。
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica: This week, the first high-profile lawsuit -- considered a "bellwether" case that could set meaningful precedent in the hundreds of other complaints -- goes to trial. That lawsuit documents the case of a 19-year-old, K.G.M, who hopes the jury will agree that Meta and YouTube caused psychological harm by designing features like infinite scroll and autoplay to push her down a path that she alleged triggered depression, anxiety, self-harm, and suicidality. TikTok and Snapchat were also targeted by the lawsuit, but both have settled. The Snapchat settlement came last week, while TikTok settled on Tuesday just hours before the trial started, Bloomberg reported. For now, YouTube and Meta remain in the fight. K.G.M. allegedly started watching YouTube when she was 6 years old and joined Instagram by age 11. She's fighting to claim untold damages -- including potentially punitive damages -- to help her family recoup losses from her pain and suffering and to punish social media companies and deter them from promoting harmful features to kids. She also wants the court to require prominent safety warnings on platforms to help parents be aware of the risks. [...] To win, K.G.M.'s lawyers will need to "parcel out" how much harm is attributed to each platform, due to design features, not the content that was targeted to K.G.M., Clay Calvert, a technology policy expert and senior fellow at a think tank called the American Enterprise Institute, wrote. Internet law expert Eric Goldman told The Washington Post that detailing those harms will likely be K.G.M.'s biggest struggle, since social media addiction has yet to be legally recognized, and tracing who caused what harms may not be straightforward. However, Matthew Bergman, founder of the Social Media Victims Law Center and one of K.G.M.'s lawyers, told the Post that K.G.M. is prepared to put up this fight. "She is going to be able to explain in a very real sense what social media did to her over the course of her life and how in so many ways it robbed her of her childhood and her adolescence," Bergman said. The research is unclear on whether social media is harmful for kids or whether social media addiction exists, Tamar Mendelson, a professor at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, told the Post. And so far, research only shows a correlation between Internet use and mental health, Mendelson noted, which could doom K.G.M.'s case and others.' However, social media companies' internal research might concern a jury, Bergman told the Post. On Monday, the Tech Oversight Project, a nonprofit working to rein in Big Tech, published a report analyzing recently unsealed documents in K.G.M.'s case that supposedly provide "smoking-gun evidence" that platforms "purposefully designed their social media products to addict children and teens with no regard for known harms to their wellbeing" -- while putting increased engagement from young users at the center of their business models. Most of the unsealed documents came from Meta. An internal email shows Mark Zuckerberg decided Meta's top strategic priority was getting teens "locked in" to Meta's family of apps. Another damning document discusses allowing "tweens" to use a private mode inspired by fake Instagram accounts ("finstas"). The same document includes an admission that internal data showed Facebook use correlated with lower well-being. Internal communications showed Meta seemingly bragging that "teens can't switch off from Instagram even if they want to" and an employee declaring, "oh my gosh yall IG is a drug," likening all social media platforms to "pushers."

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Reddit Lawyers Force Founder to Redact 'WallStreetBets' From Miami Event

著者:BeauHD
2026年1月27日 10:50

🤖 AI Summary

**要約(日本語)**

Redditは、創設者のジェイミー・ロゴジンスキー(r/WallStreetBets創設者)に対し、マイアミで開催予定のイベントから「WallStreetBets」の名称を削除するよう法的脅迫を行った。

- **初の事例**:Redditがユーザーが作ったコミュニティに対し、商標権を根拠に名称使用を禁じた「初のケース」として報道された。
- **裁判所判決**:長年の訴訟の末、裁判所はReddit側の主張を認め、これを「Rogozinski判決」と呼ばれる前例にした。判決はプラットフォームに対し、ユーザーが構築したコミュニティの商標所有権を広範に主張できる権限を与える。
- **イベントへの影響**:当初「WallStreetBets Live」と呼ばれていたイベントは、1月28〜30日開催予定だが、会場内のすべての看板・資料から名称を物理的に削除することになった。
- **ロゴジンスキーの見解**:Redditは名前の使用自体を恐れているのではなく、創設者が自分の作ったコミュニティと直接関わることや、コミュニティがサブレディット以上に拡大したことを警戒していると主張。
- **背景と意味**:元サブレディットは約300万人の購読者を抱え、他プラットフォームでも700万人以上が参加と推定される。企業の過剰介入に抗う姿勢で知られるこのムーブメントに対し、Redditが実世界の集会まで管理しようとする動きは、分散化やプラットフォームの権力集中への警鐘となっている。

この事例は、ソーシャルメディアがユーザー創造コンテンツを「デプラットフォーム」し、法的裏付けを得て実世界の活動まで制御できる可能性を示す、現代的な危機感を象徴している。
Reddit has forced Jaime Rogozinski, the founder of infamous r/WallStreetBets, to strip the WallStreetBets name from an upcoming Miami conference after legal threats citing trademark rights. According to a press release, it's the "first known case of a social media company enforcing trademark control over a user-created community." From the report: After years of litigation, courts ultimately sided with Reddit in a decision now referred to as the "Rogozinski Ruling," a precedent that grants platforms broad authority to assert trademark ownership over user-created communities. That ruling now forms the basis for Reddit's demand that the words "WallStreetBets" be physically removed from the event. "They aren't afraid of the name being used," said Rogozinski. "If they were, they'd have to sue the internet. What they're afraid of is the creator hanging out with his creation. They're afraid of the community's independence. And they're afraid it's evolved into something bigger than a subreddit." The irony is difficult to ignore. The original subreddit counts around three million subscribers, while conservative estimates place more than seven million WallStreetBets participants spread across other platforms. For a movement that built its reputation confronting corporate overreach, Reddit's decision to extend its authority beyond the confines of its web-based platform, reaching into real-world gatherings to police culture it did not create, risks stirring a hornet's nest with a long memory and a track record of collective action. The event formerly known as WallStreetBets Live, will proceed as scheduled on January 28-30 in Miami. In compliance with Reddit's demands, all references to the name will be physically redacted on-site. "Reddit's lawyers did one thing right," Rogozinski continued. "They proved exactly why we need a decentralized future. This event has become a live case study in what's broken about modern social media. Platforms can deplatform creators, and now, with courts backing them, they can appropriate what users build."

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

TikTok Alternative 'Skylight' Soars To 380K+ Users After TikTok US Deal Finalized

著者:BeauHD
2026年1月27日 10:00

🤖 AI Summary

**要約(日本語)**

TikTokの米国所有権問題とプライバシー懸念が表面化したことを受け、オープンソースでATプロトコル上に構築されたTikTok風動画アプリ **Skylight** が急成長を遂げました。

- **ユーザー数**:直近で38万人を超え、1月だけで約20,000人が新規登録。月間アクティブユーザーは約95,000人。
- **動画・再生数**:プラットフォームに直接アップされた動画は15万本以上。1日で140万本の動画が再生され、前日比で3倍に増加。
- **利用統計の伸び**:新規登録は150%超、リピーターは50%超、平均視聴時間は40%増、投稿数は100%増。
- **技術基盤**:ATプロトコルを採用し、分散型SNS「Bluesky」とも連携。Bluesky の動画もストリーミング可能。
- **機能**:内蔵動画エディタ、ユーザープロフィール、いいね・コメント・シェア、コミュニティキュレーターが作るカスタムフィードなどを提供。
- **創業・支援**:CEO トリ・ホワイト、CTO リード・ハーメイヤーが共同創業。マーク・キューバンら投資家が支援。
- **背景と意義**:TikTok のフィードが単一運営者の判断に左右される問題点を指摘し、オープンスタンダードでクリエイターとユーザーの権利を技術的に保証することを目的としている。

このように、所有権の不透明さや技術的トラブルに不安を抱くユーザーが、プライバシーとオープン性を重視した代替プラットフォームとしてSkylightへ流入し、急激な成長を見せています。
Skylight, an open-source, TikTok-style video app built on the AT Protocol, surged past 380,000 users after last week's shake-up around TikTok's U.S. ownership and privacy concerns. TechCrunch reports: Launched last year and backed by Mark Cuban and other investors, Skylight's mobile app is built on the AT Protocol, the technology that also powers the decentralized X rival Bluesky, which now has north of 42 million users. Skylight, co-founded by CEO Tori White and CTO Reed Harmeyer, offers a built-in video editor; user profiles; support for likes, commenting, and sharing; and the ability for community curators to create custom feeds for others to follow. The app now has over 150,000 videos uploaded directly to the platform. It can also stream videos from Bluesky because of its AT Protocol integration. Harmeyer said Saturday that 1.4 million videos were played on the app the day before, up 3x over the past 24 hours. The app had also seen sign-ups increase more than 150%. Other noteworthy stats include over a 50% increase in returning users, over 40% rise in video played on average, and over 100% increase in posts created. This surge was likely triggered by concerns over TikTok's change in ownership and its unfortunately timed technical glitches. [...] Over the weekend, Skylight's CEO, Tori White, said the app added around 20,000 new users and is continuing to grow. So far this January, the app has seen around 95,000 monthly active users. "We've seen what happens when one person dictates what's pushed into people's feeds," White told TechCrunch. "Not only does it harm a creator's connection with their followers, but the entire health of the platform. That's why we built Skylight Social on open standards. We wanted creator and user power to be guaranteed by the technology. Not an empty promise, but an irrevocable right."

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

❌