🤖 AI Summary
Amazonがカリフォルニアの反トラスト法違反事件において不公正な取引手法を実行していたことが新たに明らかになった。裁判文書によると、アマゾンは第三セクター販売者が他の競合するサイト(ウォルマート、ターゲット、ウェイファールなど)で価格を上げるように圧力をかけたという。その目的は、アマゾンが最も安価な価格を提供しているという印象を与え続けることだった。
文書には、クレイグ・ハンドラー(Leveretという服の会社所有者)とテリー・エーベンシャイド(ペンシルベニア州の園芸用品供給業者)の証言が含まれている。ハンドラーは2022年10月、アマゾンから出品中の商品が「Buy Box」から外れた通知を受け取り、その理由はアマゾンで同じ商品をわずか1セント高い価格で販売しているためだったと証言した。ハンドラーは自分の会社のプライシング戦略を変え、ウォルマートでの販売価格を調節したり、製品コードを変更してアマゾンの価格トラッキングシステムから逃れる試みを行った。
エーベンシャイドも、商品がBuy Boxに外れた場合、アマゾンでの売上が約80%減少すると証言した。彼はウェイファールで自分の商品を同じ価格以下で販売していることを発見し、ウェイファールでの最安値設定を上げることでBuy Boxを取り戻すことができた。
これらの文書は、アマゾンが競合するサイトの価格を追跡し、不利な状況に追い込むことで、販売者の競争力を制限している可能性があるという批判を強めている。
Newly unsealed records in California's antitrust case against Amazon allegedly show the company pressured third-party sellers to raise prices on rival sites like Walmart, Target, and Wayfair so Amazon could maintain the appearance of offering the lowest price. California says Amazon used tools like Buy Box suppression to punish cheaper listings elsewhere. The Guardian reports: [...] In one previously redacted deposition, marked "highly confidential," Mayer Handler, owner of a clothing company called Leveret, testified that he received an email in October 2022 from Amazon notifying him that one of his products was "no longer eligible to be a featured offer" through Amazon's Buy Box. The tech giant, he testified, had suppressed the item, a tiger-themed, toddler's pajama set, because his company was selling it for $19.99 on Amazon, a single cent higher than what his company was offering it for on Walmart. Afterwards, Handler testified, his company "changed pricing on Walmart to match or exceed Amazon's price" or changed the item's product code to try to throw off Amazon's price tracking system. In response to a question from the Guardian, Handler criticized Amazon for tracking prices across the internet and "shadow" blocking his company's products -- tactics which he said were depriving consumers of "lower prices." "Maybe that's capitalism," he wrote. "Or that's a monopoly causing price hikes on the consumer."
In another unsealed deposition, Terry Esbenshade, a Pennsylvania garden store supplier, testified in October 2024 that whenever his products lost Amazon's Buy Box because of lower prices elsewhere on the internet, his sales on Amazon would plummet by about 80%. This financial reality forced him to try to raise his products' prices with other retailers elsewhere, he said. In one instance, Esbenshade testified, he discovered that one of his company's better-selling patio tables had "become suppressed" on Amazon. Esbenshade wasn't sure why, he recalled, until someone at Amazon suggested he look at Wayfair, another online retailer that happened to be selling his patio table below Amazon's price. The businessman went online and set up a new minimum advertised price for the table on Wayfair to ensure it was higher than Amazon's. "So that raised the price up, and, voila, my product came back" on Amazon, he said, thanks to the reinstatement of the Buy Box.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.