ノーマルビュー

Most Australian Teens Still On Social Media Three Months After Ban

著者: BeauHD
2026年8月1日 07:00

🤖 AI Summary

>Title: オーストラリアの未成年者のソーシャルメディア利用:3か月後の禁止令でも大半が継続

オーストラリアでは16歳未満の未成年者がソーシャルメディアを使用することを禁止する措置が実施されてから3ヶ月経った現在も、約81%の10〜15歳の子供たちが引き続きソーシャルメディアを利用しているという調査結果が出ています。主なポイントは以下の通りです。

- 調査によると、大部分の子供たちは規制前の利用頻度と同じ程度にソーシャルメディアを使用し続けています。
- 帳 Reign 持有率は52%から42%に減少しましたが、特にYouTube、Snapchat、TikTokでの減少が顕著でした。
- 子供たちは自分の年齢を確認していないプラットフォームも多く、約半数が年齢確認が行われていない理由でアカウントを使用継続しています。

この結果は、ソーシャルメディアプラットフォームが効果的な年齢確認措置を実施していないことへの不満を示しており、子供たちが自身の年齢情報を適切に提供していない可能性も指摘されています。
More than 81% of Australian children ages 10 to 15 were still using social media three months after the country's under-16 ban took effect, with roughly half saying platforms never checked their age. Reuters reports: In a study published on Friday, eSafety also found most children aged between 10 and 15 were using social media just as frequently in March as they had before the ban came into force on December 10 last year, while parental awareness of their habits decreased. Children's continued social media use took place even as account ownership declined to 42% from 52%, with "statistically significant" reductions across YouTube, Snapchat and TikTok in particular, the report said. "Most under-16s who had social media accounts before commencement were able to either retain them or create new ones at the three-month mark, with social media platforms' failure to implement effective age assurance measures cited as the main reason," eSafety said in a statement [...] Before the ban, nearly 86% of children surveyed reported using at least one age-restricted platform. Three months later, that figure remained above 81%, the report said. About 58% of teenagers reported using social media daily or more often, barely down from roughly 60% before the ban, it found. The report showed minimal change in "sports and physical activity, arts and music, spending time with friends and family, and attendance at community events." Around half the children who retained their accounts said platforms had not checked their age, the most common reason they were able to stay on the services. Others said their accounts listed them as aged 16 or older or that age-checking systems had incorrectly determined they were older. The findings broadly matched snapshot data eSafety published in late March.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

❌