ノーマルビュー

Senators Demand Crackdown On Wildfire 'Prediction Markets'

著者: BeauHD
2026年8月6日 00:00

🤖 AI Summary

米国の複数の上院議員が、野火に関する「予測市場」への賭けを禁止する計画について商品先物取引委員会(CFTC)に質問を送りました。彼らは「野火に関する賭けはコミュニティの苦しみを軽減させることを目的としており、裕福な人々が利益を得られるだけ」と指摘しています。

主要な点は以下の通りです:

1. ポリマーケットと競合する予測市場サイト、コールシィ(Kalshi)では、野火に関する賭けを行っていません。コールシィ側は「結果による利益追求は避けるべき不適切な動機を生む」と主張しています。

2. ポリマーケット側は、「情報の入手先」であり「結果に基づく利益を得ない」と主張し、情報を得られる人が少なくなっても災害防止には繋がらないと反論しています。

3. 野火に関する賭け市場が提供されることによるリスクとして、州や地方消防当局は arson(放火)の危険性を指摘しています。また、内部取引の懸念もあるとのことです。
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica: Several US senators have written a letter to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), inquiring about the agency's "plans to crack down on prediction markets" that offer "contracts for individuals to bet on wildfires." "Offering bets on destructive wildfires threatens to minimize communities' suffering, all so the rich and powerful can profit," wrote (PDF) the group of senators, who represent Oregon, California, Nevada, Minnesota, and New Hampshire. The document specifically cites that Polymarket hosted bets in January 2025 on the wildfires in Los Angeles, and it mentions another website which specifically accepts "simulated bets" exclusively on California wildfires. "There's also the heightened risk -- according to state and local fire officials -- that individuals could be tempted to commit arson in order to make sure their bets are successful," the letter continues. "By offering contracts on fires, prediction market sites run the risk of encouraging people to influence fires that have already started, creating additional concerns around public safety and insider trading." [...] Kalshi spokesperson Elisabeth Diana told Ars by email that the company does not allow such wildfire markets "because they create perverse incentives." But its primary rival, Polymarket, has taken a different approach. A spokesperson for Polymarket told Ars in an emailed statement that the company does not "profit from outcomes," adding that people "come to Polymarket for information." "While we are not blind to the risks, removing these markets does not prevent a tragedy but makes the most accurate information less accessible to the people who need it most," he wrote.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

❌