ノーマルビュー

Are Return-to-Office Mandates Killing Workers' Trust in Workplaces?

著者: EditorDavid
2026年8月2日 20:34

🤖 AI Summary

>Title: 在職場返回辦公室的強制命令是否正在破壞員工對公司的信任?
>
>著者:;編輯David

=== 要點 ===
1. 根據 EnhancV 業務調查,1000 名受新或更嚴格返回辦公室政策影響的美國全職員工中,72% 认为這些命令是雇主為使其辭職而故意采取的方法。46% 的人承認「咖啡卡」行為,即在公司就職期間尋找工作;36% 在命令宣布後開始創業,以預防被解雇或主動離職。
2. 办公室返回政策的關鍵錯誤在于假設物理接近等同于員工忠誠度。這并不正確。經常往返多地出差的員工實際上只經歷了表演而非文化。
3. 大學研究顯示,返回辦公室命令降低了員工商業滿意度,卻沒有提高公司表現或價值。
4. 貝勒大學的研究表明,設有返工強制令的公司流失更多女性、高級雇員、經理和高技能員工。這些人往往是首個離職的人。留下的員工可能并非最忠誠的,而是移動性最低的。
5. 領導者混淆出席率與忠誠度的概念時,實際上創造了滿座但人心思散的工作環境。

原文:https://it.slashdot.org/story/26/08/01/0420214/are-return-to-office-mandates-killing-workers-trust-in-workplaces?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&utm_medium=feed
The Hill published the thoughts of Gleb Tsipursky, Ph.D., who serves as the CEO of the future-of-work consultancy Disaster Avoidance Experts: A recent EnhancV survey of 1,000 full-time U.S. workers subject to new or stricter return-to-office policies found that 72% suspect these mandates are really a voluntary attrition strategy — a strategy by their own employers to make them quit their jobs. A full 46% admit to the practice of coffee-badging. Thirty-six percent have applied for a new job while sitting at their current office desk. Thirty-six percent have started a side hustle since the mandate was announced, in anticipation of being let go or quitting. Those numbers do not prove that employees reject collaboration. They show that many employees no longer trust the official story... The central mistake in many in-office mandates is the assumption that proximity automatically produces commitment. It does not. A worker who spends two hours commuting to sit on video calls with colleagues in other cities is not experiencing culture. That worker is experiencing theater. When executives describe the office as a cure-all, many employees experience lost time, higher costs and lower autonomy. The policy's defining feature becomes its credibility gap. Research keeps undercutting the belief that more office time automatically means better performance. A University of Pittsburgh analysis of S&P 500 firms found that return-to-office mandates reduced employee satisfaction without improving firm performance or firm value.... Baylor University's reporting on office mandates and brain drain found that firms with mandates faced greater turnover among women, senior employees, managers and high-skilled workers, while job vacancy duration increased and hiring rates declined. In other words, the people with the most options are often the first to leave. The employees who remain may not be the most committed — they may simply be the least mobile... Attendance can be mandated, but commitment cannot. When leaders confuse the two, they do not rebuild workplace culture. They create a room full of people planning their exit.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

❌