🤖 AI Summary
この記事は、KalshiとPolymarketが臨床試験結果を予測する賭けを行っていることについての批判を取り上げています。NPRの報道によれば、これらのプラットフォームでは、映画レビューから選挙まで様々な事項に対する賭け事が行われており、その中でも最近では臨床試験が対象になっています。
Kalshiは、このような賭けが新薬承認の可能性や治療結果を予測する新たな情報源になると主張しています。しかし、ドラッグ研究者のDavid TsaiとNicholas Zaorskyは、これらの賭けは信頼性と正直さに影響を与えかねないと懸念しています。Tsaiは、試験に関わる人々が結果を意図的に操作して予想市場での収益を得る可能性があると指摘しました。
また、患者の父であるJoshua Pedersonも、「暗い考え」で「不気味なこと」と批判しています。一方で、Kalshiはこれらの予測マーケットが医療突破を追跡するためのオープンかつ透明性のあるデータセット提供につながる可能性があると主張しています。
結論として、このビジネスモデルは臨床試験の信頼性や正直さに影響を与える可能性があり、現在までにも多くの懸念が寄せられています。
An anonymous reader quotes a report from NPR: Billions of dollars are traded every week on the lightly regulated prediction market sites, where users bet on everything from movie reviews to elections to conflicts in the Middle East. Clinical trials are just the latest area where the industry's rapid growth is raising ethical questions. Kalshi claims such bets will provide a new source of information about which drugs will get approved, and what clinical trials will show promising results, which the company says can help investors decide what new drugs to fund.
"If you want to ban profiting from the failure of clinical trials, you would start with the stock market, where the financial incentive for this type of profit is orders of magnitude larger," said Kalshi spokesman Jack Such, pointing to stock market short sellers who have profited from clinical trial failures. "While Kalshi and the stock market are the same in this regard, they do differ in one important way: the stock market doesn't give any valuable information to researchers," Such said.
Drug trial researchers, though, are far from convinced. David Tsai, who runs clinical trials at a biotech company in the San Francisco Bay Area, started an online petition pushing for such betting to be banned, making the case that betting on drug trials "threatens the very foundation of trust and integrity in biotechnology." Tsai is concerned that the prospect of betting provides those involved with a clinical trial a reason to tamper with the results for a prediction market payout. "If we were running a trial for an oncology drug that requires an infusion, a pharmacist who had placed a bet saying that it's gonna work well, or doesn't work well, could obviously adjust the infusion rate, could adjust the source temperature of the drug," he said. "They could change any number of variables that could obviously have a direct impact [on] how the trial and the data and the patient safety would come out."
Another skeptic is Nicholas Zaorsky, a professor of radiation oncology at the Mayo Clinic in Jacksonville, Fla., who has helped run clinical trials and agrees that prediction markets can interfere with the advancement of life-saving drugs. "Prediction markets can be valuable in some settings because they aggregate information, but clinical trials are fundamentally different: investigators, coordinators, and sometimes even participants can directly influence aspects of the outcomes being wagered on," Zaorsky said. "That creates financial incentives that risk undermining trial integrity." Bettors should not be rooting for an experimental medicine to fail just to earn a buck, says Joshua Pederson, the father of a 12-year-old cancer patient enrolled in a clinical trial. "It's a dark idea," he said. "It's quite ghastly."
Kalshi, for its part, argues that its prediction markets could help patients track promising medical breakthroughs and clinical trials, enlisting experts including 23andMe founder Anne Wojcicki to make the case.
"Most patients don't know about the choices available in clinical trials or which programs are most promising. The opportunity to have an open, transparent dataset about trial probabilities is extremely promising and empowering for people," a white paper sponsored by Kalshi stated.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.