❌

リーディングビュー

After 50 Years, Physicists May Have Finally Found a Particle Made of Pure Force

🤖 AI Summary

50年以上にわたる探求の末、物理学者が「ゴリラグレープ」のような量子力の粒子であるグールンを主成分とする特殊な粒子(グールンボール)を見つけることに成功したという報告がある。この研究は北京での加速器実験で得られた結果に基づいており、中国の南京大学のジン・シャン博士らのチームが主導した。

彼らは高エネルギー粒子衝突を解析し、X(2370)と呼ばれる既知の粒子がグールンボールであるという強い証拠を得た。この粒子は夸力学間力媒介子からなる唯一の特殊な粒子であり、「ゴリラグレープ」の一種として知られる。

研究結果はアーカイブに投稿され、ブラジルで開催された高エネルギー物理学国際会議で発表された。ジン博士は南中国朝報紙に、「この成果は強力相互作用を説明する理論が最も厳しい検証を通過し、物理世界の理解の境界を拡張する可能性がある」と述べた。

この研究は約50年のグールンボール探査から最も明確な実験結果であり、夸力学間力媒介子が新たな物質形態を作り出すという長年にわたる理論予測を支持している。しかし、より多くの実験が必要で、さらにこの特殊なグールンボールの原型を確認し制約するためには「粒子 smashing」を行う必要があると指摘されている。
Gluons are the quantum 'Gorilla Glue' involved in binding quarks together, ScienceAlert reminds us. But for nearly 50 years, physicists have hunted for "glueballs", exotic particles predicted by this theory of the strong interaction — the only type of particle in nature composed entirely of force mediators: Now, a collaboration working at a collider in Beijing says it has the clearest evidence yet that a known particle called X(2370) is dominated by one of these elusive states... Physicists sifted through the wreckage of high-energy particle collisions to find strong evidence of this glueball, made predominantly of gluons — massless force carriers of the strong interaction between quarks... The new evidence for this exotic, unstable glueball's ephemeral existence comes from a recent preprint on arXiv, presented at the International Conference on High Energy Physics in Brazil... This collaboration uses the Beijing Electron Positron Collider II, a particle accelerator and collider that smashes electrons into their antimatter counterparts, called positrons, to probe perplexing particle physics. The resultant glueball is an "unprecedented form of matter," says Jin Shan, a particle physicist at Nanjing University and one of the research team's leaders. "It not only enables the theory describing strong interactions to pass its most rigorous test, but also vastly expands the boundaries of our understanding of the physical world," he told Fan Chen at South China Morning Post... Previously, in a study published in the journal Physical Review Letters in 2024, the researchers analyzed 10 billion meson decay events. They measured the X(2370) particle's mass and spin parity — a property that dictates its interactions and almost-instantaneous decay — for the first time, finding complete agreement between their experimental values and predictions. Now, they've identified its additional decay modes and determined its flavor-singlet nature, "the most important characteristic of a glueball...." The authors describe their work as the clearest experimental result to emerge from nearly 50 years of glueball searches, supporting the long-standing theoretical prediction that gluons can bind together into a new form of matter. The discovery ""highlights advances in technology and analytical techniques that have recently revealed another decades-in-the-making physics mystery," the article points out. "More experiments are needed to further confirm and constrain the prototypes of the highly esoteric glueball; in other words, more particle smashing."

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

  •  

SCO Successor Xinuos Asks Court to Rehear Its Claims Against IBM/Red Hat Over Project Monterey

🤖 AI Summary

SCOの継承者であるXinuosは、IBMとRed Hatに対するプロジェクト・モンテレー関連の主張について再審を要求し、長期にわたるLinux著作権の法的対立がついに終わりを見せる可能性があると報じられています。

2021年にSCOの後継者であるXinuosは、IBMがProject Montereyのコードを提供した際には非独占的なライセンスしか持っていないことから、IBMがその約束を破ったことを主張しました。Xinuosはニューヨーク南区地方裁判所に訴訟を提起し、2023年8月10日に二審法廷で再考の機会を求める権利があると判示されました。

二審法廷は、当初の法律文書により再検討する時期ではないと判断しました。Xinuosがライセンス問題ではなく所有樁に関する主張を行ったことを指摘しています。Xinuosは全判事会による再考を望んでいますが、これは通常起こらないほどまれなケースです。

関連記事:2000年にSlashdotではSCOの一つの社長とのインタビューが行われました。 SCOは約50年前に起きた「誰がUnixの所有者か?」という訴訟に関連していると指摘しています。
関連リンク:
- AIがWebページ作成の1/3を占めている、Pew Researchによる調査
- SCOのUnixの所有権に関する質問への回答
- 50年前に再燃したLinux関連訴訟
The long legal battle over ownership of Linux "is closer than ever to ending," reports the Register, "after a panel of three judges ruled a claim against IBM and Red Hat isn't valid, and that time has expired for further action." In 2021, an heir to SCO settled with IBM for $14.25 million — a sum that reflects the fact SCO had for years failed to produce strong evidence to back its claims. Another of SCO's legal successors, Xinuos, filed a new claim that IBM should be on the hook because Big Blue knew it did not own the code it contributed to Linux but instead had a non-exclusive license to use it. Xinuos argued that when IBM contributed Project Monterey code to Linux [25 years ago], it breached that license. Xinuos eventually took that argument to the US District Court for the Southern District of New York — and failed to convince it that IBM and Red Hat had a case to answer. Xinuos appealed, and on August 10th the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit decided [PDF] not to revisit the District Court's decision, agreeing that the original legalese governing Project Monterey means it's too late to re-litigate the matter. The Appeals Court also agreed that Xinuos tried to frame the case as a licensing issue but failed, instead arguing that the issue was really about ownership. That ain't all, folks, because Xinuos intends to file a petition to have the case re-heard by the full bench of the Court of Appeals. That hardly ever happens, unless the court finds significant errors or major legal issues that make a rehearing worthwhile. Law firm Kaplan says the Second Circuit has allowed reviews of less than 0.03 percent of the cases it has handled. So perhaps this matter is now close to a final resolution. Back in 2000 Slashdot interviewed one of the presidents of SCO.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

  •  

One-Third of Web Pages are Now Written With AI, Says Pew Research

🤖 AI Summary

Pew Researchのシニアデータサイエンティストが、過去5年間の50万件以上の英語ウェブページをAI検出ツールで分析し、どれほどのページがAIによって書かれているかまたは編集されているかを推定した結果、全体の10%のページにAI著者特性が見られると報告しました。ChatGPTのリリース後、新規ウェブページの3分の1以上がAIによって著作者または大量に編集された可能性があることが判明しました。

また、ウェブ上でのAI作成テキストは一様ではありません。.comドメインの約10%のページがAI作成の兆候を示す一方で、.org、.edu、.govドメインでは4.6%、1%程度にとどまっていることがわかりました。

さらに、現在のインターネットと2023年の状況を比較した結果、エムダッシュが2倍、オックスフォードコマースが増えた(63%)、AIによって頻繁に使用される言葉(例:「delve」、「interplay」、「testament」)の使用頻度が2倍になり、ネガティブな平行比較もほぼ3倍に増加したことが明らかになりました。
A Pew Research senior data scientist analyzed 500,000 English-language webpages from the past five years with an AI detection tool to estimate how many were likely written or edited by AI: Of all the pages in this sample, 10% show significant signs of AI authorship... If we filter old webpages out of our samples and look at only the pages published after the release of ChatGPT, the trend is even more pronounced. In the July 2026 snapshot, signs of AI authorship can be found in over one-third of pages published after ChatGPT was released. This is in line with other studies that have shown that large shares of recently published pages on the internet were likely written or substantially edited by AI. AI-authored text is not evenly spread across the web. When ChatGPT was first released, the kinds of linguistic patterns that can signal AI authorship appeared at similar rates across the main top-level web domains (.com, .org, .edu and .gov). But in samples from 2026, around one-in-ten pages with a .com domain show signs of AI authorship — about double the share on .org domains (4.6%), and 10 times the rate on .edu or .gov domains (both around 1%). They even identified specific ways online text has changed, "comparing the internet of today to a snapshot from 2023." Em dashes appear twice as often Oxford commas increased 63%. Words used more frequently by AI (like "delve," "interplay" or "testament") have more than doubled in usage. "Negative parallelism" comparisons ("it's not just X, it's Y") have nearly tripled.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

  •  

Could Mecha Comet's Linux PC-Phone Hybrid Be the Future of Linux Smartphones?

🤖 AI Summary

「Mecha Comet」というLinuxを基盤としたPCとスマートフォンのハイブリッドデバイスがKickstarterで334万ドルを集め、10月や11月に発送される予定です。このデバイスは、4インチのAMOLEDディスプレイ、マイク、スピーカー、SIM Tray、USBポート2基、ミニHDMIポートを搭載しており、重量とサイズはスマートフォンより少し大きいです。

開発者はShoaib Merchantで、同社は300以上の拡張機能モジュールやキーボード、ゲームパッド、I/Oブレークアウトなどのオープンハードウェア提供を予定しています。デバイス自体はUSB PD(Power Delivery)により外部電源から起動することも可能です。

Mecha Cometはカスタムなハードウェア最適化されたLinuxディストリビューションを搭載しており、使い手が「ポケットに持ち運べる専用のLinuxターミナル」のように利用できます。このデバイスには内蔵NPUがあり、AIワークフローの実行も可能です。

開発者の一人は、この製品が「Linuxスマートフォンの未来」と主張しています。彼自身は、このデバイスを使って遠隔操作を行うことを計画しており、リモートアクセスやデジタルデトックスにも適しているとします。
3,346 backers pledged $1,198,844 on Kickstarter to build the (modular) handheld Linux computer, the Mecha Comet. It's slightly bigger and heavier than your smartphone, with a 4-inch AMOLED display and loaded up with things like microphones, speakers, a SIM tray, two USB ports and a mini HDMI port. There's three separate kill switches for wifi, microphone and camera — plus a "boot mode" switch for the SD card, and even three pins for instant access to its debug console. It's now expected to ship in October or November (and is still available for preorder). Snap-in extensions include a keyboard (with programmable colors for its backlit keys), a gamepad, and a special IO Breakout that exposes the 40 pogo pins for modules, sensors, and MCUs. They're all open hardware, and founder Shoaib Merchant says "I'm looking forward to more community designs over the upcoming months." He shows the screen in action in a video on Kickstarter, demonstrating native apps like Music, Notes, Settings, and Files — as well as a Terminal app running on its color screen. A Linux correspondent at How-To Geek notes its ships "with a custom, hardware-optimized Linux distro out of the box," so "it's like having a dedicated Linux terminal in your pocket." And they argue the new device "could be the future of Linux smartphones." I should also mention that you don't necessarily have to use the battery; it can power on over USB PD without one. Overall, you're getting the same I/O you'd expect from a computer in a smartphone-like form factor, complete with modular input devices — and it's running Linux under the hood. For me, that's the most innovative gadget I've seen in the Linux hardware space in a long time... It's powerful enough to run most Linux terminal apps, which opens up a lot of possibilities. You're also getting an NPU built right into the SoC, which opens up the possibility for on-device AI workflows — something not possible in budget smartphones. Now, I personally plan to use it for SSHing into my main computer and home lab and operating them remotely. That's also why I'll be putting the LTE modem in the M.2 slot rather than an SSD — mobile data means I can reach my machines even when there's no Wi-Fi around. I also showed it to my partner, and she sees this as the ideal minimalist phone for digital detoxing. There's a built-in media player, a basic notes app, and you can even run Spotify from the terminal if you want.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

  •  

The Global Race To Make a Practical Quantum Computer Just Took a Big Leap Forward

🤖 AI Summary

量子コンピューターの実用化を目指すグローバルな競争が大きく前進したと、Tech.Slashdot は報告しています。Quantinuum社(本社:イギリス・ケンブリッジ、アメリカ・ブルームフィールド)が開発した Helios システムは、 trapped ions を用いて動作し、98 の量子ビットを操作する最大規模の trapped-ion 量子コンピューターです。これにより、従来の QCCD マシンでは実現不可能だった複数タスク同時処理が可能となりました。

Helios システムは、四方向 X 接続部というハードウェアと、最適なルートを計算する Helios ランタイムというソフトウェアにより、大きな進歩を遂げています。この技術革新により、Helios は現存の最大級のスーパーコンピューターでも可能な方法で時間とエネルギー効率よく量子計算を行うことが可能になりました。

ただし、これらの実験はランダムなベンチマークテストに過ぎず、科学や商取引における実用的な量子計算を行うには、数百万の量子ビットを必要とする可能性があります。
It's "radically different from other quantum computers" reports Phys.org. The Helios system uses trapped ions — charged atoms suspended in free space using electromagnetic fields. But it operates with 98 qubits — making it the largest trapped-ion quantum computer built so far. Quantinuum, the company behind the device, is based in Cambridge, U.K., and Broomfield, Colorado. It demonstrated earlier machines operating on 32 qubits in 2023 and 56 qubits in 2025... It relies on two major advances — one in hardware and one in software. First, the four-way X junction lets the system handle several tasks at once rather than one at a time, which is much faster. That was impossible in earlier QCCD [quantum charge-coupled device] machines, which could only move data back and forth in a single line or loop. Second, judicious use of the freedom offered by the two dimensions of the X junction relies on new classical control software called Helios runtime, which plans the smartest, fastest route for moving and processing the data. Together, these represent a substantial advance in the engineering of quantum computers. An important consequence is that Helios can perform computations that cannot be performed even on the largest supercomputers using known methods within reasonable amounts of time and power consumption. This demonstrates the ability of this device and its successors to surpass the computational prowess of classical computers — although their algorithms and hardware are rapidly advancing, too. Having said that, Helios' computations have just been random benchmark tests, so the practical importance of this leap forward is still limited. To perform quantum computations of practical importance in science and commerce, even the most optimistic estimates suggest that quantum computers must be enormously bigger and better — of the order of a million qubits.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

  •  

Twitch And Amazon Hit With Lawsuit for Training AI With Streamers' Content

🤖 AI Summary

Amazonの Twitch テーリングサービスがユーザーのストリームをAI製品に使用することなくライセンスや承認を得ること無く利用したとして、クラスアクション訴訟に見舞われました。Engadget によると、Twitchは先月、ユーザーが「チャンネルコンテンツを使用してAmazon全体での生成AIコンテンツモデルの訓練を行いたいか」を選べるオプトアウト機能を追加しました。しかし、Mike Minton(社長製品責任者)はViewerの質問に対し、「もしオプインだったなら誰も選ばないだろう」と述べ、設定はデフォルトで有効でありユーザーが参加しない場合はオプトアウトする必要があると説明しました。最新のクラスアクション訴訟では、TwitchとAmazonはストリーマーを「別々の商業AI製品の無料トレーニング素材」として利用したとして契約違反を主張しています。
A class action filed this week accused Amazon's Twitch gaming service of using video streams to fuel its AI products without licensing or obtaining permission, reports Engadget: Earlier this month, Twitch Support posted on X that it added an option to opt out of "having your channel content used to train generative AI content models across Amazon." Shortly after, Twitch hosted an episode of its recurring Patch Notes stream where Mike Minton, the company's chief product officer, said "if it was opt-in, nobody would opt in," when asked by a viewer why the Twitch settings for AI training aren't opt-in but instead enabled by default, requiring users to opt out if they don't want to participate. Now, the latest class action lawsuit claims that Twitch and Amazon committed a breach of contract when the companies decided to use its streamers as "free training stock for separate commercial AI products."

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

  •  

OpenAI Faces Safety Scrutiny After Introducing 'ChatGPT For Teens'

🤖 AI Summary

OpenAI は、13〜17歳向けの ChatGPT 版をリリースし、自殺や自己傷害に関する内容、浪漫的または性的なチャットなどに対する保護機能が強化された。Tech 分析家の Carmi Levy 氏によると、このバージョンはユーザーの年齢推定を行い、不適切な体験を防ぐとともに、学習に役立つ機能も追加しているという。

しかし、Levy 氏は、「AI が完璧ではない」と指摘。AI は一部のユーザーを誤認する可能性があり、保護機能を回避しようとする者もいるため、完全な安全性とは言えないと述べた。さらに、このバージョンは親が子供のオンライン活動を監視する意欲を減退させる可能性があるとして、「逆効果」であると批判した。

CNN によれば、OpenAI は ChatGPT の不適切な会話が若者に被害を与えているとして訴訟に直面している。新機能には、90 分間の利用後に休憩を促す機能や、「静寂時間」や「学習時間」などの設定があり、ChatGPT は既存の保護機能を改善し、ユーザーから個人的感情表現を防ぐとともに、プライベートまたは機密な画像のアップロードに注意を叫ぶ機能も追加された。

この新バージョンは若者のオンライン安全を高める可能性があるが、専門家の多くは慎重な姿勢で受け止めている。OpenAI の親子コントロール機能を利用して子供の ChatGPT アカウントを確認することが推奨されている。
This week OpenAI launched a version of ChatGPT exclusively designed for teenagers between the ages of 13 and 17, reports CTV, "saying this version came with stronger protections around content related to mentions of suicide, self-harm and romantic or sexual chats." [Tech analyst Carmi Levy says] "What it's doing is it's using cues, it's sort of watching how you're using the tool, and it's trying to guess your age." Levy said if ChatGPT thinks a person has lied about their age when they first signed up, it will automatically put them into the Teens mode for protection. "It includes those sort of two things: prevent you from having experiences that are age inappropriate, and also add features that are aligned with academics, so that makes it easier to study, makes it less likely for you to cheat on an assignment, provide resources that that that allow you to learn more effectively," he said. Levy reminded users that this is still an application and a web service, which means it's constantly collecting personal information about the users' activities on the device and using the data to estimate their age... In the event a user is talking about self-harm, this new version will block the conversation and suggest additional help or call emergency or mental health services, Levy explained. It would do the same with violent content, eating disorders, engaging in dangerous activities, as well as explicit, sexual or graphic content. "It's using AI again to sort of parse out that conversation: 'are we headed in a in a significant direction? If so, throw up that guardrail, stop it from happening, redirect.'" However, the tech analyst said a number of people who have attempted to bypass the guiderails for research have succeeded in doing so "with a little bit of prompting.... I wouldn't call it 100% safe. That's kind of the catch-22 of the entire AI industry." This will lead parents to think that their children are safer and reduce the oversight on their online activities, which Levy described as a "perverse impact" that is "problematic." "Parents should not assume that OpenAI has their kids' best interests at heart. They should also not assume that these technologies are perfect. They will miss certain things, and they will also engage in what we call false positives," he said. "An adult who's legitimately is in the platform might be tagged as a child because the AI simply got it wrong." OpenAI's blog post says the new mode was designed for "preserving the ability to learn, create, and explore." But CNN notes the move "comes as OpenAI faces a string of lawsuits alleging that inappropriate conversations with ChatGPT contributed to the harm or deaths of young people." [New tools] include nudges for teen users to take a break if they've been active for 90 minutes within a three-hour window. OpenAI is also adding options for teens or parents to set "Quiet Hours" when ChatGPT is unavailable or "Study Hours" where ChatGPT's study mode for learning will be on by default. The company also said it has improved protections to prevent ChatGPT from expressing personal feelings toward a user. And it's adding reminders that caution teens to think twice if they try to upload a private or sensitive image to the chatbot... Nearly a third of American teens use AI chatbots daily, a Pew Research Center study published in December found. ChatGPT was by far the most popular AI chatbot in the survey, with more than half of those teens reporting having used it. Engadget shared this observation from Josh Golin, the executive director of Fairplay, a non-profit advocating for policies to make the internet safer for children. "Most parents, overwhelmingly, do not avail themselves of [parental oversight] tools, in part because they are deliberately made hard to find and use." Golin's group wanted to see testing of the tools first to see whether they led to better outcomes for teenagers. "The way this was just announced feels more like a response aimed at public relations than actual deep thinking about what kind of support [teens] need." And Mashable got a similar quote from Robbie Torney, head of AI/digital assessments for Common Sense Media's Youth AI Safety Institute. OpenAI's teen experience makes important safety commitments, but "What we really need now is evidence that they work, and we need this evidence, including our testing and the testing of others, before anyone, including parents, puts real trust in ChatGPT for Teens." Importantly, Torney said parents shouldn't assume their child is using ChatGPT for Teens. While OpenAI uses age estimation to place users in the age-appropriate version of ChatGPT, it can still mistake a user as older. Parents can be sure their child is using the teen version by linking their ChatGPT account to their child's and implementing OpenAI's parental control features. If a teen has previously lied about their age — and plenty do — they may continue to access the adult version of ChatGPT... Torney said caregivers must enact parental controls to receive notifications from OpenAI should their teen discuss suicide, self-harm, or acts of violence in immediate or dangerous ways... An OpenAI spokesperson said every notification is reviewed by a trained human before it's sent. The company strives to review notifications in under one hour.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

  •  

Iran-linked Cyberattackers Shut Down a UK Power Plant for Four Days

🤖 AI Summary

イランに関連するサイバー攻撃者が4日間にわたり英国の発電所を停止させたという Telegraph の報道が伝えられています。詳細は BBC によると、政府はイギリスのエネルギーシステムへのリスクはないと表明し、DESNZ(エネルギー安全保障とネットゼロ担当省)は電力会社にサイバー攻撃に関する注意喚起を発表しました。影響を受けたのは小型ガス発電機で、広域の電力システムには影響を与えることはありませんでした。

この記事によると、イラン系ハッカーが関与したという事実も示されています。Slashdot はさらに、OpenAI の安全性が問われる事件や他のお知らせを掲載しています。
"Iran shut down a British power plant for four days in an unprecedented cyber attack," reports the Telegraph. More details from the BBC: The government said that at no point was there a risk to the UK's energy system, but the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero (DESNZ) has contacted power companies to advise them about the risk of cyber attacks... DESNZ said the incident had affected a small-scale generator and at no point had there been a risk to the wider energy system. The UK's power network has a number of smaller gas generators which provide short-term power when needed. Thanks to Alain Williams (Slashdot reader #2,972) for sharing the news.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

  •  

Slovakia Finds Russian Backdoor In Traffic Speed Cameras

🤖 AI Summary

Slovakian政府为了现代化交通监控而采购了速通摄像头,但发现了多个安全问题。国家安全部(NBU)发现这些设备存在短信激活的俄罗斯后门、缺乏认证且IP地址可直接访问实时视频流等问题。报告推测这些摄像头是由一家圣彼得堡公司Semicon生产的,并通过一家塞浦路斯的空壳公司以虚假认证购买。

最严重的是,这些摄像头包含了一组硬编码的俄罗斯电话号码列表,可用于打开后门。来自这些号码的短信可以提供shell和网络访问权限。安全启动功能无效,管理门户也可能被未授权者访问。

Slovakian Interior Ministry已经停用了已安装设置的摄像头,并将请独立审计员确认NBU的研究结果。推测其他东欧国家如克罗地亚可能也存在类似问题但尚未发现。
Slovakia acquired speed cameras to modernize its traffic control-- but there was a surprise. Tom's Hardware cites this story from the Risky Bulletin Newsletter: Unfortunately, the country's national security service, the NBU, has discovered that the cameras have multiple security issues. Firstly, they have SMS-activated Russian backdoors. Secondly, live camera feeds can be accessed by anyone with the device IP, no password necessary... [The cameras] are thought to be rebranded Russian CORDON PRO.M traffic cameras, produced by a St. Petersburg-based firm called Semicon... reportedly bought via a Cyprus-based shell company with fake certifications. Reports also suggest that pressure from the opposition political party in Slovakia led to the NBU investigations... Probably most seriously, in terms of national security, these cameras contain a hardcoded list of Russian phone numbers, which can be used to open a backdoor. An SMS from one of these numbers can open shell and network access... [T]he SecureBoot feature is ineffective, and the web management portal can be accessed, exposing live streams, by anyone with the camera IP. Cameras that have been installed and set up have since been deactivated by the Slovak Ministry of the Interior. Meanwhile, for due diligence, an independent auditor will be called in to confirm the NBU's findings. It is thought that Croatia, and some other countries in Eastern Europe, may have undiscovered issues with traffic control cameras of similar origin.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

  •  

Stanford Economist Now Believes an AI Job Apocalypse Is Unlikely

🤖 AI Summary

エリック・ブレインドルフスンスタanford大学経済学教授は、人工知能(AI)による「雇用大虐殺」は起こらないと断言しています。彼はスタンフォードデジタル経済研究所の研究者たちとの共同研究で明らかにしました。ブレインドルフスン教授は、「ワシントンポスト」によれば、AIによる経済規模の雇用破壊はまだ見られていません。「低レベルの雇用は影響を受けるかもしれませんが、経験豊富な労働者如き先任コーダーへの需要は今後も高いままとなるでしょう」と予測しています。

さらに彼は、「Canaries in the Coal Mine? 人工知能による最近の雇用影響についての6つの事実」報告書を更新し、AIによる広範な雇用破壊は見られないと表明しました。ブレインドルフスン教授によると、今後10年以内にAIの能力が大幅に向上する一方で、失業率は歴史的な範囲内で安定すると予想しています。

彼はまた、ビジネスや経済には大きな影響があると指摘し、労働生産性が2%を超える成長を遂げる見込みであることも強調しました。さらに、AIを人間の補完手段として活用することで雇用を増やすことができると述べています。

一方で、低レベルの職種に深刻かつ持続的な影響がある可能性も認め、新規就労者の登録口が閉ざされてしまう可能性があることを警告しています。また、AIを使って若い従業員の教育を短縮する企業もあると指摘しました。
"There is still no sign of economy-wide job destruction," says economist Erik Brynjolfsson. Working with researchers at the Stanford Digital Economy Lab, Brynjolfsson has determined an AI "job apocalypse" is unlikely, reports the Washington Post, "even though it will likely impact entry-level jobs." And Brynjolfsson "predicts that demand for experienced workers such as senior coders will still be high even if AI takes on more routine knowledge and coding work in the future." Earlier this month, Brynjolfsson and his colleagues at the Stanford Digital Economy Lab updated their widely publicized report, "Canaries in the Coal Mine? Six Facts about the Recent Employment Effects of Artificial Intelligence," to reflect that they do not see widespread, economy-wide job displacement associated with AI... Brynjolfsson: What has moved on the upside is productivity. Nonfarm business productivity growth is running over 2 percent, the best sustained stretch since the late-1990s boom... The gains show up years after the investment, and they're starting to show up... By 2030, we will have enormously more capable AI, meaningfully faster productivity growth and an unemployment rate that looks unremarkable — somewhere in its historical range. That surprises people, but it's what the mechanism implies... [T]he technology is becoming much more powerful, and it's going to be even more powerful. Secondly, there are huge implications for business and the economy, including some increases in living standards, but also, potentially, job disruption. And then, thirdly, we must act now to address this gap. We can't just sit back and wait for the tsunami to hit us. And one of the things we can do is put in place institutions, policies and research to make the technology more complementary — using AI to complement people so it creates more jobs. A common misconception among business managers is AI, in order to be effective, has to reduce jobs. That's just not true. You can use AI to increase employment and productivity at the same time. It's kind of a win-win... Right now, tax policy is very skewed toward favoring capital versus labor — and, as a consequence, a lot of entrepreneurs and managers, they're basically being guided by the federal government to replace workers with machines. And I don't think that's necessarily what we'd like to have happen. From an economist's perspective, what you want to be doing is not mimicking and replacing things. You want to be extending and complementing — have humans do new things they never could have done before. He acknowledges "real, persistent and widening" effects on entry-level jobs, with a labor market "closing the on-ramp for people starting their careers... If companies don't hire people at the base of the pyramid, then they're not going to have those people later when they need them." One he points out that one company is instead using AI to speed up its training of young employees.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

  •  

23 Years After SimCity 4's Release, 'Eternal Commuter' Bug Finally Fixed

🤖 AI Summary

SimCity 4 Network Addon Mod(NAM)は、現在で23年経った今でも機能し続けています。最新のアップデート50では、「永恒的な通勤ループ」バグがついに修正されました。

このバグは、ゲーム内のシミュレーションマップ境界線での路線計画アルゴリズムの問題によって引き起こされます。これにより、シミュレーターの「市民」が無駄な通勤ルートを追跡し続け、労働に就かずながら労働需要と交通状況が悪化します。

NAMは道路ネットワークとインフラストラクチャの大幅な改善も伴っており、新しいバージョンではDLLの強制的な導入によりコードベースがほぼ90%削減され、バグ発生のリスクも下がりました。

これらのことから、SimCity 4の歴史の中で最も長く続いた問題が解決されたと言えます。
"It began life just a year after SimCity 4's 2003 launch," writes the blog PCGamesN. "Now, over 20 years later, it's still going strong with the arrival of Network Addon Mod update 50." The SimCity 4 Network Addon Mod, or simply 'NAM' among the community, has long been a de facto recommendation to anyone looking to pick up the classic city builder. It's a comprehensive overhaul to the game's transportation and infrastructure networks that combines key fixes with a vast set of additional build pieces such as overpasses, intersections, on-ramps, roundabouts, and so on.... [Y]ou'll be able to place down elements adjacent to one another that might previously have needed a one-tile gap between them. Streets can be dragged diagonally, slope tolerances have been improved, and you can build tunnels with the street network. The new version also includes a fix for the 'Eternal Commuter Loop' bug, which might sound fairly innocuous if you're not deep in the weeds. In actuality, it's a 23-year-long frustration that has plagued modders ever since launch. Essentially, it's a problem with the regional pathfinding across city boundaries in certain layouts, causing your Sims to bounce from location to location in search of work without actually taking up a job in any of them. Your zone demand is ruined, traffic builds to unsustainable levels, and the economy falls to pieces before your very eyes. Until now, the only real solution was to simply avoid building layouts that gave your commuters the chance to loop between locations. Now, by blocking specific neighbor-to-neighbor routes while allowing the rest to run as normal, the problem has been resolved... Equally impressively, the mandatory implementation of the DLL has reduced the size of the NAM codebase "by almost 90% and by more than ten million lines, making it easier to maintain and reducing the chance of bugs." Thanks to long-time Slashdot reader Striek for sharing the news.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

  •  

Canonical is Funding a PhD to Automate C to Rust Translation

🤖 AI Summary

CanonicalとUK Research and Innovationは、ブリス톨大学のプログラミング言語研究グループを経由して、Cコードベースを自動的にRustに変換するシステムを作る3年間のPhDプロジェクトに共同で資金提供を行っています。

このプロジェクトはアレックス・ウッドによって行われます。彼は Meng Wang 教授のもとで学び、共証人として Cristina David 博士と Canonical のジョナサン・セガーがサポートします。プロジェクトの目標は、C言語の数万行を超えるコードベースを「安全かつ動作的に正しく、維持可能なRust」に自動的に変換することです。

このニュースの他の関連記事もあります:Microsoftは2030年までに全C/C++コードをRustに置き換える計画があり、Python財団はDEI制約により政府からの基金拒否など。
An anonymous reader shared this report from the blog It's FOSS: Canonical has committed funding to a three-year PhD project focused on building a system that can automatically translate large C codebases into Rust. And they are not alone; UK Research and Innovation is matching their funding for the project, which is set to run through the University of Bristol's Programming Languages Research Group. The PhD is aiming to build an all-encompassing platform that can take a C repository running into hundreds of thousands of lines and translate it into Rust that's "safe, behaviourally correct and maintainable Rust." The work will be carried out by a student, Alex Wood, who will be supported by Professor Meng Wang leading the work, with Dr. Cristina David and Canonical's Jon Seager serving as co-supervisors.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

  •  

Supply Chain Issues Delaying US Grid Batteries' Installation

🤖 AI Summary

米国のグリッド向けバッテリー設置が供給網の問題で遅れているという記事を要約します。

1. **背景**:電力需要の増加とデータセンターのエネルギー需要の拡大により、バッテリー需要が急激に高まっています。しかし、米国のグリッドは二十余年間の投資停滞期があり、大規模なアップグレードが必要になっています。
2. **問題**:必要な設備不足や人材不足により、建設コストと工期が増加し、電力会社は間に合わせるのが難しくなっています。また、コンデンサなどの専門機器の調達に時間がかかるため、特定のプロジェクトには数年単位の遅延が生じています。
3. **事例**:ニューヨーク州のCon Edでは、発電需要増加によるインフラストラクチャへの圧迫を防ぐために、開発者はアップグレード費用の一部を負担するよう求められました。しかし、この方法は平均で約21百万ドルの追加コストを生み出し、少なくとも25のプロジェクトが中止されたという批判も recibió.
4. **展望**:Wood Mackenzieによると、米国の蓄電市場は六年内に四倍になると予想されています。しかし、多くの計画が遅延や中止により実現しない可能性があります。

この記事は、米国のエネルギーシステムの近代化とそれに伴う供給網の問題を浮き彫りにしています。
Falling prices have made grid-scale storage batteries more attractive, reports Bloomberg. But after decades of stagnant investment, America's grids "are racing to make the upgrades needed to plug them in," with supplies straining for the necessary equipment. Demand for batteries has skyrocketed as electricity use across the U.S. swells, driven by data centers' booming energy needs and increasing electrification. It's also getting harder to get them connected to power grids... As those upgrades get delayed, storage projects are piling up in interconnection queues from coast to coast. For example, Consolidated Edison Inc., a major utility in New York state, says over the last two years the volume of battery storage projects waiting to be connected has grown by 300%... "The whole process of interconnecting these new power plants got really log-jammed and bottlenecked," said Joseph Rand, an energy policy researcher at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory... Nationwide, some 750 gigawatts of energy storage projects — roughly equivalent to the generating capacity of more than 700 nuclear reactors — are in line to get grid connections, according to the lab's research. Not all of these projects will get built. Many developers already abandoned the queue because of delays. Still, the waiting time is increasing; the median was five years in 2025, up from a year and a half in 2015. The flood of battery projects is expected to continue. Wood Mackenzie, an energy consultancy, projects the U.S. energy storage market will quadruple in the next six years... [Shortages in key equipment] have driven up construction costs and time lines for grid upgrades, leaving utilities struggling to build fast enough. A drought of skilled workers is further slowing them down... In California, PG&E Corp., the state's largest utility, told regulators in January that a key driver of delays was long lead times for specialized equipment. Procuring certain breakers could take nearly four years, according to the utility, which reported a 300% increase in its interconnection workload compared to prior years. In Northern California, for example, holdups to circuit breaker upgrades to a substation in Solano County led to projected delays for two battery projects worth a combined 450 megawatts. Transmission line work in the Bay Area has put another 800 megawatts of energy storage at risk of delay, according to PG&E. Last year New York's Con Ed started requiring developers to help pay for upgrades if their projects will push power demand and strain infrastructure. But that also drew criticism: According to a survey conducted by the trade group New York Battery and Energy Storage Technology Consortium (NY-BEST), the new methodology raised costs by an average of $21 million per project, a 14-fold increase. At least 25 projects have been canceled as a result, according to the group. Battery advocates have appealed to state regulators to get Con Ed to abandon the new policy. Thanks to Slashdot reader Bruce66423 for sharing the news.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

  •  

Debian is Voting on Whether to Allow AI-Assisted Contributions

🤖 AI Summary

デビアン開発者はAI補助の貢献を禁止するかどうかについて投票中である。投票では、8つの案と「上記以外」の選択肢がある。案1はデビアン社会契約を変更してLLM(大規模言語モデル)による貢献を禁止する案で、パッケージング、ソフトウェア、ドキュメンテーションなど直接的なデビアン作業からAIを使用することは禁じられるが、上流プロジェクトでは影響しない。案2は、技術的品質、セキュリティ、ライセンス、有用性を確認し、大きな変化を完全に理解して公開する限り、一部または全部でLLMを使用した貢献を許可する案である。案5はもっとオープンで、デビアンが生成AIツールの支援や禁止を行わず、品質や正しさ、維持可能性などの基準を全ての貢献に適用すべきとする。

案1は3:1の過半数が必要だが、その他の7つの案は単純な過半数で可決。デビアン作業におけるAI利用に関する議論は、AIによる生成物がコードベースに入荷する前に実際に何を生成したかを確認する方法が確立されていないことへの懸念も含んでいる。

さらに、"デビアンは人間によって作られる"という案もあり、これはAIツールの制限ではなく、実際にはどの貢献物がデビアンに含まれるかに焦点を当てている。この案では、AIによる研究、分析、探索や批評は可能だが、AI生成物を直接的にパッケージング、パッチ、ドキュメンテーションなどとして提出することは禁じられる。

Strike GraphのCEOは「実際の問題に対する適切な解決策ではない」として、デビアンでのAI禁止は「AI自体を封鎖すること」ではなく、「生成されたコードが実際に何であるかを確認する方法が確立されていないことへの懸念」だと述べている。
Debian developers are voting on whether to ban AI-assisted contributions, reports the blog Linuxiac, with a ballot listing eight proposals and a "None of the above" option. The first one is still the original proposal to ban LLM-assisted contributions by changing the Debian Social Contract. This would stop generative AI from being used for direct Debian work like packaging, software, documentation, translations, websites, and project communication. However, upstream projects made with AI help would not be affected. The proposal gives several reasons for the ban, such as unclear copyright and licensing, doubts about the reliability of AI-generated work, extra review work for maintainers, aggressive scraping of Free Software resources, and the high resource use of large AI systems... The second option would clearly allow contributions that are partly or fully made by an LLM, as long as contributors check their technical quality, security, licensing, and usefulness, fully understand the changes, and disclose major AI help. It would also ban sending private or sensitive Debian information to untrusted external AI services. A similar fourth option recognizes worries about generative AI but says banning it would be hard to enforce and not helpful. This proposal would accept AI-assisted Debian work if it follows the Debian Free Software Guidelines, is properly reviewed and understood by the contributor, and is marked as AI-assisted when needed. The fifth proposal is even more open. It says Debian should not support or ban generative AI tools, but should apply the same standards for quality, correctness, maintainability, and legality to all contributions, no matter how they were made... One unique proposal is called "Debian is created by humans." Instead of banning AI tools for contributors, it focuses on what actually gets included in Debian. With this approach, contributors could use generative AI for research, analysis, exploration, or critique, but could not submit AI-generated output directly as Debian packaging, patches, documentation, bug reports, project communications, or other Debian work. As the proposal says: humans create Debian. Another, much stricter proposal asks Debian contributors to avoid LLM use as much as possible. It would require all Debian communication, like bug reports, mailing-list messages, Salsa discussions, and Planet Debian posts, to be written only by humans. Any AI use in Debian work would have to be disclosed, and violations could be handled under the project's Code of Conduct. The CEO/founder of AI-native compliance management platform company Strike Graph believes a Debian AI ban is "the wrong fix for the actual problem" at hand, reports The New Stack: "Debian's ban isn't really about banning AI," [CEO Justin] Beals says. "It's an admission that nobody has built a reliable way to verify what an AI agent actually produced before it lands in a codebase this many systems depend on, including infrastructure running in orbit. That's a legitimate thing to be worried about...." He thinks that any policy statement that says AI isn't allowed simply won't hold up, as the tooling keeps getting harder to detect... Looking across the complete set of tabled propositions, proposal A (no LLM contributions to Debian via social contract) needs a 3:1 majority to pass; the other seven proposals (B to H) need a simple majority.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

  •  

Defamation Suit Demanding Elsevier Retract Paper Heads Closer To Trial

🤖 AI Summary

Global Plasma Solutions (GPS)とElsevierとの間で起こっている1億ドル相当の名誉毀損訴訟は、来月7日に裁判日が設定されました。2021年にBuilding and Environment誌に掲載されたGPSの針点双極イオン化技術に関する論文に関して、審査を拒否したにもかかわらずElsevierが再tractionを拒否したことから始まった訴訟です。この論文はCOVID-19パンデミック中に主要な空気清浄機として宣伝され、GPSには大規模な財政損失が生じたと主張されています。

裁判所の判断により、原告であるGPSは「実際に悪意」を示していると認められました。これは、「事実の誤りを知っていながら真実性に対する注意を怠る態度」を指します。2024年5月にDavid Keesler法廷誌が判決を下し、2025年7月にはMartin Reidinger法曹も同様の推薦を認めていました。

訴訟では、Elsevierは19種類のジャーナルを評価した結果、1,200以上の論文が審査なしで掲載されたり、編集者の推奨に反して発表されたことを主張しています。また、この事件はすでに Elsevier に対して1万ドルの罰金を科せられています。

この裁判は来月7日に始まり、GPSとElsevierが争う焦点は、論文掲載の際の適切な審査プロセスの欠如や、その結果として生じた財政的損失についてです。
Retraction Watch reports: A trial date has been set in a $1 billion defamation case against Elsevier that alleges the company published what plaintiffs say was a manipulated study about an air purifying technology over objections from peer reviewers. The case has already cost Elsevier a $10,000 sanction from a judge. Global Plasma Solutions (GPS), which makes air quality products, sued Elsevier in 2022 after the publisher declined to retract a 2021 paper in Building and Environment about GPS' needlepoint bipolar ionization technology, which it heavily marketed during the COVID-19 pandemic as an air purifier. The complaint claims Elsevier is responsible for the authors' alleged omission of data and misleading conclusions in the paper that fueled "massive" financial losses for the company, its lawyers claim. Elsevier knew the paper "failed peer review" under its "own standards," but moved forward with the article despite this knowledge, according to GPS, which now goes by GPS Air. The complaint has survived a bid by Elsevier to dismiss the case, and a trial has been set for Dec. 7. In allowing the case to proceed, U.S. Magistrate Judge David Keesler said in a May 2024 opinion that GPS has "plausibly alleged actual malice" by Elsevier defined as "knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard for the truth." Chief Judge Martin Reidinger of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina upheld Keesler's recommendation in July 2025... Citing internal and discovery documents, GPS alleges an assessment of 19 journals revealed Elsevier has published more than 1,200 articles either without any peer review, or against the recommendations of the reviewers. Thanks to long-time Slashdot reader sandbagger for sharing the article.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

  •  

Microsoft Blames Windows Gaming Issues On RGB Lighting Devices

🤖 AI Summary

Microsoftは、8月2026年版のWindows更新後にゲームがクラッシュしたり起動しないなどの問題が発生している原因として、RGB照明機能を持つ周辺機器を blame しています。BleepingComputerによると、Microsoftはこの問題について調査し始めました。影響を受けるゲームには「ARC Raiders」、「MARVEL Tokon: Fighting Souls」、「The Finals」などがあり、 THESEタイトルはWindows 11 24H2と25H2のシステムで動作します。RGB照明機能を持つ周辺機器や内部デバイスコンポーネントが「inpoutx64」と類似したファイル名を持つドライバーをインストールし、そのようなドライバーがあるシステムでは特定のゲームを起動すると問題が引き起こされることが指摘されています。
BleepingComputer reports: Microsoft says ongoing issues causing games to crash or fail to launch after installing the August 2026 Windows updates may be caused by peripherals with RGB lighting. As Microsoft explained when it confirmed it's investigating on Wednesday, this known issue affects games like ARC Raiders, MARVEL Tokon: Fighting Souls, and The Finals on systems running Windows 11 24H2 and 25H2... "[Peripherals or internal device components with RGB lighting features] may install drivers or code components with file names similar to inpoutx64. In systems where these drivers are found, the issue is then triggered by launching certain games," it noted. Thanks to Slashdot reader joshuark for sharing the article.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

  •  

Battery Fires At Recycling Centres Are Costing the UK £1bn a Year

🤖 AI Summary

英国のリサイクルセンターでのバッテリー-related火灾每年造成的损失估计达到10亿英镑,主要原因是错误丢弃的锂离子电池,如电子烟中的电池。英国废弃物管理行业贸易组织环境服务协会(ESA)报告称,2026年3月止的一年内,成员们共上报了1518起火灾事件,其中至少541起直接与锂电池有关;另有216起发生在垃圾车上的火灾也涉及电池。

ESA认为实际的火灾数量可能远高于报告的数量。他们表示,“我们知道40%的回收中心火灾是由于电池引起的,但我们估计实际比例约为70%。”该协会呼吁对所有电子烟征收5英镑押金,以激励用户将使用过的设备返回给零售商进行安全处理。

据称,电子烟是最主要的原因之一,因为它们价格低廉、供应充足且使用寿命较短。
Wrongly discarded lithium batteries, such as those in vapes, are causing more than 10 fires a week at U.K. recycling centers, according to figures shared with the Guardian: The Environment Services Association (ESA), the trade body for waste management companies, said its members had reported 1,518 fires in the year to March 2026. At least 541 of these fires were directly attributed to lithium ion batteries, the survey found. There were a further 216 battery fires in bin lorries [garbage trucks]. The ESA said the reported number of battery-related fires underestimated the scale of the problem, because in most incidents it was impossible to determine the cause of the blaze. A spokesperson said: "We know 40% of fires at recycling centres are caused by batteries, but we think the actual number is more like 70%." It estimates that annual cost of these fires has increased from £150m in 2021 to £1bn today... The ESA is calling for a £5 deposit scheme on the sale of all vapes to ensure that vape users have an incentive to return used devices to retailers for safe disposal... [Patrick Brighty, the head of recycling policy at the ESA, said] "Vapes are among the biggest culprits because they're cheap, abundant and typically have a short use-life." Thanks to long-time Slashdot reader AmiMoJo for sharing the news.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

  •  

How Will AI Change the Field of Mathematics?

🤖 AI Summary

AIは短い期間で数学分野でのプロフェッショナルなレベルに達したという話題です。AIは数式や数値が少ない学術的な論文ではまだ不十分ですが、他の領域では優れた成果を挙げています。これには古い手法を新しい方法に応用したり、異なる分野間のつながりを見つけ出す能力があります。

数学研究者たちは新たな分野への展開や新質問の提示を望んでいますが、AIはそういった役割を果たさないことが懸念されています。これが分野を停滞させる可能性があり、予想外で新しい発見がないかもしれません。

また、大学院生からは将来の研究者の立場が不安視されている声も聞かれました。AIの普及によって検査者にならざるを得ないのかという疑問もあります。

数学家の一部はAIによる論文の質疑応答の増加に対し懸念を示していますが、一方で才能ある大学生が大学院レベルの研究を行う例も報告されています。しかし、これらのツールを使うには高額なコストが伴うことも指摘されています。

結局のところ、適切に利用されるならばAIは数学分野全体にとってプラスになるでしょう。
"AI went from being very terrible to seemingly genuinely quite good at a professional level in a very short space of time..." says the Verge's AI reporter. But AI systems "are still truly, truly terrible at some areas of math... even the days of the week." If you look at academic math papers, a lot of the time you won't see numbers... So they're still terrible, but they're now also very good at this other part. As to why, at some point you reach a critical mass of what these systems can do. We saw it with writing, we've seen it with programming. They're very good at forging connections between different areas, applying old methods in new ways, those kinds of things. It appears that the newer models they're training have apparently reached that level where it clicks, and now it can do math... There are areas now where it seems to be producing work that is on par with good mathematicians, alongside other parts where yeah, it can't count. All caught up in that is whether it's going to rewrite employment structures or funding structures... One would hope [math researchers] would branch out into all of these new exciting areas or pose new questions. But AI won't do that, and that's the concern. And then that would leave the field quite sterile, and it will have all of these things that have been done, and maybe nothing left to pursue... [A] lot are scared that it's closing off the field. So by definition, those breakthroughs that lead to something surprising and new that you can say, "Oh, this works here," may not be happening anymore... There were some bleak responses from graduate students I saw in essays posted online. Where's their place in this as future researchers? Do they have a place in this? Is it as glorified AI proof checkers? That will be quite an unsatisfying career, I imagine. Or maybe not, I don't know. We will see. I think anything used properly will be a net boon. They also had an interesting response when asked if AI democratizes access to high-level mathematical proofs: A lot of the mathematicians I spoke to were almost quite weary of this, actually. They love the idea, in theory, of democratizing access. They're also quite fed up with AI-generated or -assisted papers that are flooding every publication imaginable, as well as the pre-print servers that they use in these fields. Some of those I spoke to said things like, "Oh, I got three emails this week alone with people being like, 'Hey, is this legit?'" Because they thought they'd solved something with ChatGPT or with Claude, and they also don't have the mathematical skills to check whether they've actually solved something. On the flip side, there are parts where they said, "Well, we've got a talented undergrad who's done something that a talented undergrad would probably have never managed, and here they are doing grad-level work and they've produced a paper that is legit." And in the bigger scheme of things, a few I spoke to said, "Well yeah, a lot of these are in the ivory tower. Having access to this kind of thing globally could really boost access to the kind of things here." On the flip side, the cost. These things cost a lot to run.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

  •  

Rush Rescue Mission for NASA's $500M Space Telescope Fails

🤖 AI Summary

NASAの5億ドル相当の宇宙望遠鏡を救う緊急ミッションは失敗したとCNNが報告しています。LINK衛星はスウィフト望遠鏡の軌道を上げる作業を実行することができず、NASAはこの古い望遠鏡が今年年内に地球大気层で焼却される見込みだと発表しました。

LINK衛星は7月3日に打ち上げられましたが、数週間後に制御不能に陥りました。開発会社のKatalystが制御を取り戻すことができましたが、これによりスウィフトとの接近作業が1カ月遅れました。しかし、その遅延はミッションの阻止要因にはなりませんでした。

NASAのジェイダッド・アイザックマン局長は、「我々はこのミッションを挑み、迅速かつリスクを冒すことを望んだ。それは未来の衛星修復能力にとって重要な経験になるだろう」と述べています。LINK衛星は今後もスウィフトとの接近作業を行う予定ですが、救援ではなく実証実験となる見込みです。

「我々はLINKの接近試みから学びを重ね、それを次のミッションに活かすことができる」とアイザックマン局長は述べています。SWIFT望遠鏡は軌道修復が設計されていないため、今回の試みから得た教訓は将来的な衛星修理任務にも生かされる可能性があります。
Remember that rush rescue mission for NASA's $500M space telescope? It failed, reports CNN, and the LINK satellite won't be able to boost the telescope's orbit. NASA says its decades-old Swift telescope will now continue losing altitude, until it reaches Earth's atmosphere later this year and burns up. CNN reports: Just weeks after LINK lifted off on July 3, it started to spin out of control. [Satellite designer] Katalyst was able to regain control of the satellite, but the company acknowledged that the issue cost it time, which would delay LINK's rendezvous with Swift by about a month. However, that postponement — at least initially — did not seem to be a deterrent to the mission. Now, NASA and Katalyst have announced that LINK's mission will not capture and boost Swift to a higher orbit "due to ongoing attitude control issues," according to statements Wednesday. "NASA should be willing to move quickly and take smart risks when the potential return is worth it, and that is exactly what we did with this mission," NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman said in a statement. "This is not the outcome we were working toward, but it does not change why this mission was worth attempting. The team moved with extraordinary speed to give Swift a chance to carry out more science while advancing capabilities America will need for satellite servicing in the future...." The mission team is forging ahead with its plan for LINK to rendezvous with Swift — but as a demonstration rather than a rescue. "We are going to learn everything we can from LINK's rendezvous attempt and put those lessons to work on the missions that follow," Isaacman said... Swift wasn't designed to be serviced in space, which means that insights from the demonstration could be used for future missions... "We have already learned a tremendous amount," [said Ghonhee Lee, CEO of Katalyst Space Technologies], "and now our job is to turn those lessons into something durable — building a repeatable playbook to inform future rendezvous and proximity operations and satellite servicing."

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

  •  

Flock is Secretly Building a Powerful New Prompt-Based AI Tool for Police

🤖 AI Summary

【要約】

ウェブサイトSlashdotのfjo3から共有されたWiredの記事によると、AI会社Flockが秘密裏に警察向けの新しいプロンプトベースの強力なAIツールを開発していることが明らかになりました。Flockは以前、「個人を識別することができない」と公表していましたが、現在は車両のパターンから運転者や車両を特定し追跡できるシステムを開発しています。

このAIツールは警察の案件ファイル、911通報ログ、商業アイデンティティ記録などにもアクセス可能です。これにより Plates(車牌)が人物名、住所、家族などの個人情報へとつながります。警官は場所、時間、行動パターンを提示することで、該当する人々のリストを得ることができます。

Flockは現在、少人数の警察パートナーと共にテストを行い、販売される製品の機能とは異なる可能性があります。このAIツールは政治的压力や不適切な使用例、各地での破壊行為に対する警官からの批判などに直面しています。

この記事では、「FlockはALPR(Automatic License Plate Recognition)以上のことを目指し、警察用デジタルプラットフォームとなりうる」という法律学者の見解も引用されています。
Slashdot reader fjo3 shared this article from Wired: [Flock] has told the public for years that its technology "cannot recognize, identify, or track individuals." It has now built a system that does both, an artificial intelligence tool for police that can identify drivers and track vehicles by their patterns of movement alone, WIRED has learned... Because the system also reaches police case files, 911 dispatch logs, and commercial identity records, those plates can be turned into names, home addresses, and relatives. It can search for people in an area drawn on a map based on nothing more than a physical description... The code describes 45 tools at the AI's disposal, giving it access to plate scans and camera metadata, arrest records, case files, dispatch logs, ballistics results, and commercial databases that contain Social Security numbers, dates of birth, phone numbers, email addresses, relatives and associates. Flock says it is testing the product with a small group of law enforcement partners and describes it as still in development, with capabilities that may not reflect what it eventually sells. It arrives as the company faces bipartisan political pressure, a growing record of officers caught misusing its platform, and a wave of vandalism that has left cameras sawed off and lenses painted over in cities across the country... An officer no longer needs a plate, a name, or a crime to begin: They supply a place, a stretch of time, and a pattern of behavior, and the system is designed to hand back the people who fit... One prompt Flock preloaded into the system reads: "Find me witnesses based on vehicles most seen in [neighborhood] during [last 14 days] during [daily timeframe] *(will not include whitelisted vehicles)." An officer would fill in the blanks and submit it. The output is a list of plates, which other tools in the product then convert into names and home addresses. Another prompt instructs the system to list everyone arrested more than twice in two years for "any offense," exempting only narcotics arrests, and then says to map where those people live, retrieve the calls for service at their homes, and "do a workup on the top three individuals." The prompt begins with everyone in the area who has an arrest record and ends with dossiers on three of them, chosen by the software. A "workup," in Flock's terminology, is a one-command background check. It starts with a name and a date of birth and returns what the department's records and commercial data hold: vehicles, prior listings as a suspect, and, on a second screen, relatives, phone numbers, and online accounts. Wired shares this reaction from a law professor at George Washington University. "It is clear Flock has aspirations far beyond ALPRs to become a digital platform for policing,"

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

  •  
❌