ノーマルビュー

Brookhaven Lab Shuts Down Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC)

2026年2月8日 21:34

🤖 AI Summary

**ブロークヘイブン国立研究所(BNL)の相対性重イオン衝突装置(RHIC)閉鎖まとめ(2026年)**

- **25年にわたる歴史と功績**
- 2000年に本格稼働し、金原子核の200 GeV/n衝突やスピン整列した陽子ビームの衝突など、他に類を見ない実験を実施。
- 初期の重イオン衝突でクォーク・グルオン・プラズマ(QGP)を生成し、2010年に「ほぼ完璧な液体」‑低粘性・高渦度のプラズマであることを確認。
- 反物質の大規模生成、陽子スピン問題の解決に寄与し、ビッグバン直前の状態を再現する世界唯一の装置となった。
- 2023年には新種の量子もつれを発見するなど、常に最前線の物理を探求。

- **最終衝突と残されたデータ**
- 2026年2月6日、DOE副長官ダリオ・ギルが赤いボタンを押し、最終衝突が行われた。
- 最終ランは約1年にわたり、数百ペタバイトのデータを取得。
- その中で「仮想粒子」の直接観測が報告され、量子真空の新たな探査手段となった。
- データは今後も解析が続き、RHICの科学的遺産は衝突停止後も生き続ける。

- **後継装置:電子イオン衝突装置(EIC)**
- RHICの地下リングのうち1本を流用し、電子ビームを加える新しいリングを建設予定(10年スパン)。
- EICは電子を「ナイフ」として重イオンを切り込み、クォーク・グルオンの構造をより精密に観測できる。
- 米国で初めての新規粒子加速器となり、欧州・アジアに先行された粒子物理の舞台に米国が再参入するシンボル。
- 「少なくとも10〜15年は、世界の若手物理学者にとってトップの研究拠点になる」ことが期待されている。

- **意義と今後**
- RHICの閉鎖は米国内唯一のヘビオン衝突型加速器の終焉であるが、EICの建設により「ビッグバン直前の物質」への探求は次のステージへと進む。
- 科学者たちは「甘く切ない」気持ちでRHICを送り出しつつ、より強力な装置で新たな発見を目指す姿勢を示している。
2001: "Brookhaven Labs has produced for the first time collisions of gold nuclei at a center of mass energy of 200GeV/nucleon." 2002: "There may be a new type of matter according to researchers at Brookhaven National Laboratory." 2010: The hottest man-made temperatures ever achived were a record 4 trillion degree plasma experiment at Brookhaven National Laboratory in New York... anointed the Guinness record holder." 2023: "Scientists at Brookhaven National Laboratory have uncovered an entirely new kind of quantum entanglement." 2026: On Friday, February 6, "a control room full of scientists, administrators and members of the press gathered" at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) at Brookhaven National Lab in Upton, New York to witness its final collisions, reports Scientific American: The vibe had been wistful, but the crowd broke into applause as Darío Gil, the Under Secretary for Science at the U.S. Department of Energy, pressed a red button to end the collider's quarter-century saga... "I'm really sad" [said Angelika Drees, a BNL accelerator physicist]. "It was such a beautiful experiment and my research home for 27 years. But we're going to put something even better there." That "something" will be a far more powerful electron-ion collider to further push the frontiers of physics, extend RHIC's legacy and maintain the lab's position as a center of discovery. This successor will be built in part from RHIC's bones, especially from one of its two giant, subterranean storage rings that once held the retiring collider's supply of circulating, near-light speed nuclei...slated for construction over the next decade. [That Electron-Ion Collider, or EIC] will utilize much of RHIC's infrastructure, replacing one of its ion rings with a new ring for cycling electrons. The EIC will use those tiny, fast-flying electrons as tiny knives for slicing open the much larger gold ions. Physicists will get an unrivaled look into the workings of quarks and gluons and yet another chance to grapple with nature's strongest force. "We knew for the EIC to happen, RHIC needed to end," says Wolfram Fischer, who chairs BNL's collider-accelerator department. "It's bittersweet." EIC will be the first new collider built in the US since RHIC. To some, it signifies the country's reentry into a particle physics landscape it has largely ceded to Europe and Asia over the past two decades. "For at least 10 or 15 years," says Abhay Deshpande, BNL's associate laboratory director for nuclear and particle physics, "this will be the number one place in the world for [young physicists] to come." The RHIC was able "to separately send two protons colliding with precisely aligned spins — something that, even today, no other experiment has yet matched," the article points out: During its record-breaking 25-year run, RHIC illuminated nature's thorniest force and its most fundamental constituents. It created the heaviest, most elaborate assemblages of antimatter ever seen. It nearly put to rest a decades-long crisis over the proton's spin. And, of course, it brought physicists closer to the big bang than ever before... When RHIC at last began full operations in 2000, its initial heavy-ion collisions almost immediately pumped out quark-gluon plasma. But demonstrating this beyond a shadow of a doubt proved in some respects more challenging than actually creating the elusive plasma itself, with the case for success strengthening as RHIC's numbers of collisions soared. By 2010 RHIC's scientists were confident enough to declare that the hot soup they'd been studying for a decade was hot and soupy enough to convincingly constitute a quark-gluon plasma. And it was even weirder than they thought. Instead of the gas of quarks and gluons theorists expected, the plasma acted like a swirling liquid unprecedented in nature. It was nearly "perfect," with zero friction, and set a new record for twistiness, or "vorticity." For Paul Mantica, a division director for the Facilities and Project Management Division in the DOE's Office of Nuclear Physics, this was the highlight of RHIC's storied existence. "It was paradigm-changing," he says... Data from the final run (which began nearly a year ago) has already produced yet another discovery: the first-ever direct evidence of "virtual particles" in RHIC's subatomic puffs of quark-gluon plasma, constituting an unprecedented probe of the quantum vacuum. RHIC's last run generated hundreds of petabytes of data, the article points out, meaning its final smash "isn't really the end; even when its collisions stop, its science will live on." But Science News notes RHIC's closure "marks the end for the only particle collider operating in the United States, and the only collider of its kind in the world. Most particle accelerators are unable to steer two particle beams to crash head-on into one another."

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Have We Been Thinking About Exercise Wrong for Half a Century?

2026年2月8日 17:34

🤖 AI Summary

**要約(日本語)**

50年以上続いた「毎日一定時間の運動をしろ」という指導は見直されつつあります。米国や世界保健機関は、もはや「中程度・激しい有酸素運動の最低時間」を設定していません。研究によれば、**30秒程度の短い高強度の動作**(例:数階分の階段を速く上る)でも、ジムでの長時間運動に匹敵する健康効果が得られることが分かっています。これを **VILPA(Vigorous Intermittent Lifestyle Physical Activity)** と呼び、以下の点が示されています。

- **1日4分程度**、数階の階段を「勢いよく」上がるだけで、体重低下や脳の老化抑制、脳卒中・心臓病リスクの大幅削減が期待できる。
- 米国の研究では、こうした日常的な激しい瞬間活動が**死亡率を44%減少**させたと報告。
- 効果は「**強度が最重要**」で、1分の激しい活動は、3分の中程度、または35〜49分の軽い活動と同等の予防効果がある。
- 呼吸で強度を判断できる:歌える=軽い、話せるが歌えない=中程度、会話が続かない=激しい。

**結論**
「運動は時間で測るべき」から「**すべての身体活動が価値ある**」へと考え方が転換。毎日の生活に取り入れやすい数分間の高強度動作—階段の上り降りや急いで歩くなど—が、長寿と健康維持に大きく寄与すると期待されています。
"After a half-century asking us to exercise more, doctors and physiologists say we have been thinking about it wrong," writes Washington Post columnist Michael J. Coren. "U.S. and World Health Organization guidelines no longer specify a minimum duration of moderate or vigorous aerobic activity." Movement-tracking studies show even tiny, regular bursts of effort — as short as 30 seconds — can capture many of the health benefits of the gym. Climbing two to three flights of stairs a few times per day could change your life. Experts call it VILPA, or vigorous intermittent lifestyle physical activity. "The message now is that all activity counts," said Martin Gibala, a professor and former chair of the kinesiology department at McMaster University in Canada... Just taking the stairs daily is associated with lower body weight and cutting the risk of stroke and heart disease — the leading (and largely preventable) cause of death globally. While it may not burn many calories (most exercise doesn't), it does appear to extend your health span. Leg power — a measure of explosive muscle strength — was a stronger predictor of brain aging than any lifestyle factors measured in a 2015 study in the journal Gerontology... How little activity can you do? Four minutes daily. Essentially, a few flights of stairs at a vigorous pace. That's the effort [Emmanuel Stamatakis, a professor of physical activity and population health at the University of Sydney] found delivered significant health benefits in that 2022 study of British non-exercisers. "We saw benefits from the first minute," Stamatakis said. For Americans, the effect is even more dramatic: a 44 percent drop in deaths, according to a peer-reviewed paper recently accepted for publication. "We showed for the first time that vigorous intensity, even if it's done as part of the day-to-day routine, not in a planned and structured manner, works miracles," Stamatakis said. "The key principle here is start with one, two minutes a day. The focus should be on making sure that it's something that you can incorporate into your daily routine. Then you can start thinking about increasing the dose." Intensity is the most important factor. You won't break a sweat in a brief burst, but you do need to feel it. A highly conditioned athlete might need to sprint to reach vigorous territory. But many people need only to take the stairs. Use your breathing as a guide, Stamatakis said: If you can sing, it's light intensity. If you can speak but not sing, you're entering moderate exertion. If you can't hold a conversation, it's vigorous. The biggest benefits come from moderate to vigorous movement. One minute of incidental vigorous activity prevents premature deaths, heart attacks or strokes as well as about three minutes of moderate activity or 35 to 49 minutes of light activity.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Are Big Tech's Nuclear Construction Deals a Tipping Point for Small Modular Reactors?

2026年2月8日 13:35

🤖 AI Summary

**要約(日本語)**

米国の原子力産業が転換点に来ていると Fortune が報じた。2024年1月、Meta はビル・ゲイツの TerraPower とサム・アルトマン支援の Oklo と提携し、約 4 GW(約300万世帯分)に相当する小型モジュラー原子炉(SMR)プロジェクトを開始した。主な用途は、オハイオ州に建設予定の Meta の「Prometheus」AIメガキャンパスと、同社が所有・運営する多数のデータセンターへのクリーンで安定した電力供給である。

- **業界関係者の見解**
- Wedbush Securities のテックリサーチ責任者 Dan Ives は、Meta の動きを「警告射撃」と呼び、2026年までにほぼすべての大手テック企業が核エネルギー事業に参入すると予測。
- 2030 年が規模拡大の分水嶺となり、米国で新たな核時代が本格化する可能性が高いと指摘。

- **SMR の特長**
- 従来の大型原子炉が10年かかるのに対し、SMR は約3年で建設可能。
- モジュラー方式なので、需要に応じて1~2基ずつ段階的に増設でき、データセンター「ハイパースケーラー」の電力需要に柔軟に対応できる。

- **リスクと期待**
- Oklo の CEO Jacob DeWitte は、脱炭素電源と安定したベースロード電力が欠如すれば大きなリスクになると警告。
- ハイパースケーラーは電力の最終消費者として市場の実在性を認識しており、核エネルギーの普及に重要な役割を果たすと述べた。

**結論**
Meta の核パートナーシップは、テック企業が自社データセンターのエネルギー需要を満たすために核エネルギーを本格的に取り入れる「最初の一撃」とみなされ、今後数年でSMR が大規模に導入されれば、米国のエネルギー政策とクリーンエネルギー転換に大きな転機をもたらす可能性がある。
Fortune reports on "a watershed moment" in American's nuclear power industry: In January, Meta partnered with Gates' TerraPower and Sam Altman-backed Oklo to develop about 4 gigawatts of combined SMR projects — enough to power almost 3 million homes — for "clean, reliable energy" both for Meta's planned Prometheus AI mega campus in Ohio and beyond. Analysts see Meta as the start of more Big Tech nuclear construction deals — not just agreements with existing plants or restarts such as the now-Microsoft-backed Three Mile Island. "That was the first shot across the bow," said Dan Ives, head of tech research for Wedbush Securities, of the Meta deals. "I would be shocked if every Big Tech company doesn't make some play on nuclear in 2026, whether a strategic partnership or acquisitions." Ives pointed out there are more data centers under construction than there are active data centers in the U.S. "I believe clean energy around nuclear is going to be the answer," he said. "I think 2030 is the key threshold to hit some sort of scale and begin the next nuclear era in the United States." Smaller SMR reactors can be built in as little as three years instead of the decade required for traditional large reactors. And they can be expanded, one or two modular reactors at a time, to meet increasingly greater energy demand from 'hyperscalers,' the companies that build and operate data centers. "There's major risk if nuclear doesn't happen," Oklo chairman and CEO Jacob DeWitte told Fortune, citing the need for emission-free power and consistent baseload electricity to meet skyrocketing demand. "The hyperscalers, as the ultimate consumers of power are, are looking at the space and seeing that the market is real. They can play a major role in helping make that happen," DeWitte said, speaking in his fast-talking, Silicon Valley startup mode.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

A New Era for Security? Anthropic's Claude Opus 4.6 Found 500 High-Severity Vulnerabilities

2026年2月8日 11:34

🤖 AI Summary

**要約(日本語)**

Anthropic が新たに公開した大規模言語モデル **Claude Opus 4.6** が、ほとんど指示を与えずにオープンソースライブラリ内の **500 件以上の未発見の高深刻度ゼロデイ脆弱性** を検出したことが報じられた。

- **テスト方法**:Anthropic の「frontier red team」がサンドボックス環境で脆弱性解析ツールを併用し、モデルの「アウト・オブ・ザ・ボックス」機能だけでバグ探索を実施。すべての脆弱性は社内メンバーまたは外部のセキュリティ研究者により検証済み。
- **主な発見例**
- **GhostScript**(PDF・PostScript 処理ユーティリティ)のクラッシュを引き起こす欠陥
- **OpenSC**(スマートカードデータ処理)のバッファオーバーフロー
- **CGIF**(GIF 画像処理)のバッファオーバーフロー
- **意義**:AI がサイバー防御に大きく貢献できる転換点を示すと同時に、攻撃側にも同様のツールが利用可能になるリスクも指摘された。
- **今後の展望**:Anthropic の赤チームリーダー Logan Graham は、AI を活用した脆弱性発見ツールの導入を検討中。「モデルは極めて優秀で、さらに性能が向上する見込みがある。将来的にオープンソースソフトウェアのセキュリティ確保手段の主流になる可能性もある」と語っている。

この結果は、AI が自動的にゼロデイ脆弱性を大量に発見できることを示し、ソフトウェアセキュリティ分野における新たな時代の幕開けとなる可能性がある。
Axios reports: Anthropic's latest AI model has found more than 500 previously unknown high-severity security flaws in open-source libraries with little to no prompting, the company shared first with Axios. Why it matters: The advancement signals an inflection point for how AI tools can help cyber defenders, even as AI is also making attacks more dangerous... Anthropic debuted Claude Opus 4.6, the latest version of its largest AI model, on Thursday. Before its debut, Anthropic's frontier red team tested Opus 4.6 in a sandboxed environment [including access to vulnerability analysis tools] to see how well it could find bugs in open-source code... Claude found more than 500 previously unknown zero-day vulnerabilities in open-source code using just its "out-of-the-box" capabilities, and each one was validated by either a member of Anthropic's team or an outside security researcher... According to a blog post, Claude uncovered a flaw in GhostScript, a popular utility that helps process PDF and PostScript files, that could cause it to crash. Claude also found buffer overflow flaws in OpenSC, a utility that processes smart card data, and CGIF, a tool that processes GIF files. Logan Graham, head of Anthropic's frontier red team, told Axios they're considering new AI-powered tools to hunt vulnerabilities. "The models are extremely good at this, and we expect them to get much better still... I wouldn't be surprised if this was one of — or the main way — in which open-source software moving forward was secured."

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

The World's First Sodium-Ion Battery in Commercial EVs - Great at Low Temperatures

2026年2月8日 10:17

🤖 AI Summary

中国のバッテリーメーカーCATLと長安自動車は、2026年中頃に世界初の乗用車向けナトリウムイオン電池を搭載したEVを実用化する計画です。搭載される「Naxtra」電池は、チャガン Nevo A06セダンで約400 km(中国軽自動車テストサイクル)を走行でき、エネルギー密度は175 Wh/kgでニッケルリッチ系より低いものの、リチウムイオンリン酸系(LFP)と同等です。最大の特徴は低温性能で、‑30℃でも放電出力がLFPの約3倍とされ、火災リスクの低減や極端な気候への適応が期待されます。今後はAvatr、Deepal、Qiyuan、Uniといった長安グループの他モデルへも順次展開され、リチウムイオンとナトリウムイオンが補完し合う「二元化学」エコシステムの構築が目指されます。
Long-time Slashdot reader Geoffrey.landis shared this report from InsideEVs: Chinese battery giant CATL and automaker Changan Automobile are preparing to put the world's first passenger car powered by sodium-ion batteries on public roads by mid-2026. And if the launch is successful, it could usher in an era where electric vehicles present less of a fire risk and can better handle extreme temperatures. The CATL Naxtra sodium-ion battery will debut in the Changan Nevo A06 sedan, delivering an estimated range of around 400 kilometers (249 miles) on the China Light-Duty Test Cycle. From there, the battery will roll out across Changan's broader portfolio, including EVs from Avatr, Deepal, Qiyuan and Uni, the company said. "The launch represents a major step in the industry's transition toward a dual-chemistry ecosystem, where sodium-ion and lithium-ion batteries complement each other to meet diverse customer needs," CATL said in a press release... It delivers 175 watt-hours per kilogram of energy density, which is lower than nickel-rich chemistries but roughly on par with lithium ion phosphate batteries... Where the Naxtra battery really stands out, however, is cold-weather performance. CATL says its discharge power at -30 degrees Celsius (-22 degrees Fahrenheit) is three times higher than that of lithium ion phosphate batteries.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Is the 'Death of Reading' Narrative Wrong?

2026年2月8日 08:12

🤖 AI Summary

**要旨(日本語)**

デジタル機器の普及が読書を壊滅させたという「読書の死」説は、実際のデータと照らし合わせると過大評価されている。社会心理学者アダム・マストロイアニは、以下の点を指摘している。

1. **販売・書店の実態は好調**
- 2025年の書籍売上は2019年を上回り、パンデミック期に近い水準。
- 米国では2023年にだけでも422店の独立書店が新規オープンし、Barnes & Noble も復調の兆し。

2. **読書量の統計は微減程度**
- Gallup の調査では、年間11冊以上読む「メガリーダー」が1‑5冊に減少したが、過去30年で大きなトレンドは認められない。
- National Endowment for the Arts のデータは、読者率が2012年の55%から2022年は49%へわずかに低下。
- American Time Use Survey でも2003〜2023年の読書時間はやや減少。

3. **デジタル依存の伸びは鈍化**
- ソーシャルメディア利用はピークを過ぎ、時間は減少傾向。
- アプリ開発者はユーザーの注意を引き続けるのが難しくなっている。

4. **読書は過去のメディア侵入を乗り越えてきた**
- ラジオ、テレビ、インターネット、TikTok などの登場にもかかわらず、紙の文字への欲求は残存。
- 最も中毒性の高いデバイスを持つ人々でも、時折デバイスをオフにして本を手に取ることは「奇跡的」だ。

結論として、読書の衰退は「大きな問題」かどうかは個人の評価次第であり、今後も停滞か回復の可能性があるとマストロイアニは主張している。ニュースヘッドラインが描く「読書の死」は、実際の統計と比べて過度に悲観的である。
Has the rise of hyper-addictive digital technologies really shattered our attention spans and driven books out of our culture? Maybe not, argues social psychologist Adam Mastroianni (author of the Substack Experimental History): As a psychologist, I used to study claims like these for a living, so I know that the mind is primed to believe narratives of decline. We have a much lower standard of evidence for "bad thing go up" than we do for "bad thing go down." Unsurprisingly, then, stories about the end of reading tend to leave out some inconvenient data points. For example, book sales were higher in 2025 than they were in 2019, and only a bit below their high point in the pandemic. Independent bookstores are booming, not busting; at least 422 new indie shops opened in the United States last year alone. Even Barnes & Noble is cool again. The actual data on reading, meanwhile, isn't as apocalyptic as the headlines imply. Gallup surveys suggest that some mega-readers (11+ books per year) have become moderate readers (1-5 books per year), but they don't find any other major trends over the past three decades. Other surveys document similarly moderate declines. For instance, data from the National Endowment for the Arts finds a slight decrease in the percentage of U.S. adults who read any book in 2022 (49%) compared to 2012 (55%). And the American Time Use Survey shows a dip in reading time from 2003 to 2023. Ultimately, the plausibility of the "death of reading" thesis depends on two judgment calls. First, do these effects strike you as big or small...? The second judgment call: Do you expect these trends to continue, plateau, or even reverse...? There are signs that the digital invasion of our attention is beginning to stall. We seem to have passed peak social media — time spent on the apps has started to slide. App developers are finding it harder and harder to squeeze more attention out of our eyeballs, and it turns out that having your eyeballs squeezed hurts, so people aren't sticking around for it... Fact #2: Reading has already survived several major incursions, which suggests it's more appealing than we thought. Radio, TV, dial-up, Wi-Fi, TikTok — none of it has been enough to snuff out the human desire to point our pupils at words on paper... It is remarkable, even miraculous, that people who possess the most addictive devices ever invented will occasionally choose to turn those devices off and pick up a book instead. The author mocks the "death of reading" hypothesis for implying that all the world's avid readers "were just filling time with great works of literature until TikTok came along."

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Is AI Really Taking Jobs? Or Are Employers Just 'AI-Washing' Normal Layoffs?

2026年2月2日 21:34

🤖 AI Summary

**要約(日本語)**

- 2025年に発表された5万人以上の人員削減のうち、AIを理由にしたものが多数あると、調査会社Challenger, Gray & Christmasが報告している。
- しかし、企業が「AIが仕事を奪う」ことを口実にしているケースが増えており、実際にはAI導入の準備が整っていない「AI‑washing」(AI洗浄)と指摘する声が強い。
- Forresterのレポートやホートン校のPeter Cappelli教授は、企業が「将来的にAIが取って代わる」と言いながら、現時点で実装できるAIはほとんどないと批判している。
- ブルッキングス研究所の調査でも、AIはまだ労働市場全体に大きな変化をもたらしていないことが確認されている。実際の大量解雇は、2022年以降のパンデミック期の過剰採用の是正が主因で、テック企業だけで世界総計70万人以上が削減された。
- AIを理由にすることで、企業は「経営計画の失敗」や「財務目標未達」などのネガティブイメージを回避しやすくなる。たとえばAmazonは官僚主義の削減を理由にしたが、アナリストはAI投資(データセンター等)の資金確保が真の目的と見ている。
- 結論として、AIが将来的に仕事を変える可能性はあるものの、現時点では「AIによる解雇」よりも過剰採用の是正や財務上の都合が主因であり、企業がAIを言い訳に使う「AI‑washing」現象が顕在化している。
The New York Times lists other reasons a company lays off people. ("It didn't meet financial targets. It overhired. Tariffs, or the loss of a big client, rocked it...") "But lately, many companies are highlighting a new factor: artificial intelligence. Executives, saying they anticipate huge changes from the technology, are making cuts now." A.I. was cited in the announcements of more than 50,000 layoffs in 2025, according to Challenger, Gray & Christmas, a research firm... Investors may applaud such pre-emptive moves. But some skeptics (including media outlets) suggest that corporations are disingenuously blaming A.I. for layoffs, or "A.I.-washing." As the market research firm Forrester put it in a January report: "Many companies announcing A.I.-related layoffs do not have mature, vetted A.I. applications ready to fill those roles, highlighting a trend of 'A.I.-washing' — attributing financially motivated cuts to future A.I. implementation...." "Companies are saying that 'we're anticipating that we're going to introduce A.I. that will take over these jobs.' But it hasn't happened yet. So that's one reason to be skeptical," said Peter Cappelli, a professor at the Wharton School... Of course, A.I. may well end up transforming the job market, in tech and beyond. But a recent study... [by a senior research fellow at the Brookings Institution who studies A.I. and work] found that AI has not yet meaningfully shifted the overall market. Tech firms have cut more than 700,000 employees globally since 2022, according to Layoffs.fyi, which tracks industry job losses. But much of that was a correction for overhiring during the pandemic. As unpopular as A.I. job cuts may be to the public, they may be less controversial than other reasons — like bad company planning. Amazon CEO Jassy has even said the reason for most of their layoffs was reducing bureaucracy, the article points out, although "Most analysts, however, believe Amazon is cutting jobs to clear money for A.I. investments, such as data centers."

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Linux Kernel Developer Chris Mason's New Initiative: AI Prompts for Code Reviews

2026年2月2日 18:34

🤖 AI Summary

**要約(日本語)**

Linux カーネル開発者であり Btrfs の創始者でもある Chris Mason 氏が、LLM(大規模言語モデル)を活用したコードレビュー用の AI プロンプト集を Git リポジトリで公開しました。主なポイントは以下の通りです。

- **目的**:Linux カーネルのパッチレビューを AI が支援し、レビューの正確性と効率を向上させること。
- **手法**:大きな差分(diff)を「タスク」単位に分割し、各タスクごとに個別のレビューを行う。これにより、必要なトークン数が減り、全体コンテキストを何度もやり取りする必要がなくなる。
- **効果**:トークン消費の削減だけでなく、細分化されたレビューによりバグ検出率が上がるという初期的な成果が報告されている。
- **現状**:数週間にわたって開発が進められており、最新の変更は本日リポジトリにプッシュされ、コミュニティからのフィードバックを募集中。
- **今後の期待**:現在のペースが続けば、Linux カーネルのコードレビュー工程において AI が重要な補助役割を果たす可能性が高い。

Mason 氏は「タスク化したレビューで大規模な diff を小さく分割すれば、トークン使用量が減り、バグもより多く捕捉できる」と述べ、メーリングリストで意見募集を呼びかけています。

---
この取り組みは、Meta のエンジニアとも協力し、上流のカーネル開発者にとって実用的かつ信頼できる AI 支援レビューを目指すものです。今後の実装とコミュニティの反応が注目されます。
Phoronix reports: Chris Mason, the longtime Linux kernel developer most known for being the creator of Btrfs, has been working on a Git repository with AI review prompts he has been working on for LLM-assisted code review of Linux kernel patches. This initiative has been happening for some weeks now while the latest work was posted today for comments... The Meta engineer has been investing a lot of effort into making this AI/LLM-assisted code review accurate and useful to upstream Linux kernel stakeholders. It's already shown positive results and with the current pace it looks like it could play a helpful part in Linux kernel code review moving forward. "I'm hoping to get some feedback on changes I pushed today that break the review up into individual tasks..." Mason wrote on the Linux kernel mailing list. "Using tasks allows us to break up large diffs into smaller chunks, and review each chunk individually. This ends up using fewer tokens a lot of the time, because we're not sending context back and forth for the entire diff with every turn. It also catches more bugs all around."

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Startup Uses SpaceX Tech to Cool Data Centers With Less Power and No Water

2026年1月26日 14:44

🤖 AI Summary

**カーマン・インダストリーズ(米カリフォルニア)の新冷却システム**

- データセンターの冷却に、SpaceX のロケットエンジン技術を応用した高速回転コンプレッサー(30,000 rpm)を採用。
- 冷媒は高圧液体二酸化炭素(CO₂)で、従来のファンや水冷に比べて **エネルギー消費を半分以下に抑え、使用水をゼロ** にできる。
- 設備占有面積は従来の **80%削減** が可能で、冷却負荷の 40%を占める電力使用量の大幅削減が期待される。
- 冷却した熱は空気に放散できるほか、余熱回収で発電にも利用可能。
- チームの約 1/3 は元 SpaceX/Rocket Lab のエンジニアで、航空宇宙・EV技術を転用。
- 最近 **2,000万ドルの資金調達** に成功し、ロングビーチでのコンプレッサー製造を今年中に開始予定。

データセンターが米国全体の電力消費の約 8%、水使用は年間 330 億ガロンに達する中、同社の技術は環境負荷低減とコスト削減の新たな解決策として注目されている。
California-based Karman Industries "says it has developed a cooling system that uses SpaceX rocket engine technology to rein in the environmental impact of data centers," reports the Los Angeles Times, "chilling them with less space, less power and no water." Karman has developed a cooling system similar to the heat pumps in the average home, except its pumps use liquid carbon dioxide as refrigerant, which is circulated using rocket engine technology rather than fans. The company's efficient pumps can reduce the space required for data center cooling equipment by 80%. Over the years, data centers have used fans and air conditioning to blow cold air on the chips. Bigger facilities pass cold liquid through tubes near the chips to absorb the heat. This hot liquid is sent outside to a cooling yard, where sprawling networks of pipes use as much water as a city of 50,000 people to remove the heat. A 50 megawatt data center also uses enough electricity to power a mid-sized city... Cooling systems account for up to 40% of a data center's power consumption and an average midsized data center consumes more than 35,000 gallons of water per day... U.S. data centers will consume about 8% of all electricity in the country by 2030, according to the International Energy Agency... The cooling systems are projected to use up to 33 billion gallons of water by 2028 per year... To serve this seemingly insatiable market, Karman has developed a rotating compressor that spins at 30,000 revolutions per minute — nearly 10 times faster than traditional compressors — to move heat... About a third of Karman's 23-person team came from SpaceX or Rocket Lab, and they co-opted technologies from aerospace engineering and electric vehicles to design the mechanics for the high-speed motors. The system uses a special type of carbon dioxide under high pressure to transfer heat from the data center to the outside air. Depending on the conditions, it can do the same amount of cooling using less than half the energy. Karman's heat pump can either reject heat to air, or route it into extra cooling, or even power generation. The company "recently raised $20 million," according to the article, "and expects to start building its first compressors in Long Beach later this year...."

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

New Linux/Android 2-in-1 Tablet 'Open Slate' Announced by Brax Technologies

2026年1月26日 13:24

🤖 AI Summary

**Brax Technologiesが「Open Slate」タブレットを発表**

- **製品概要**
- プライバシー重視の 2-in-1 タブレット。ARM CPU 搭載で、消費者向けタブレットとしてだけでなく、Linux ワークステーションとしても利用可能。
- 前作のプライバシー志向スマートフォン *BraX3* の開発経験とコミュニティからのフィードバックを活かした次世代デバイス。

- **設計コンセプト**
1. **モジュラリティ**:ユーザー交換可能なバッテリーに加え、M.2 スロットでストレージや拡張カードを自由に追加できる。
2. **ハードウェアレベルのプライバシー**:無線、センサー、マイク、カメラなど主要コンポーネントを物理スイッチで完全オフに可能。
3. **マルチOS対応**:複数の Android 系 OS と、ネイティブ Linux ディストリビューションを長期的にサポート。
4. **長寿命設計**:部品交換やソフトウェア更新がしやすく、長期間の使用を前提に設計。

- **価格・販売計画**
- 小売価格はベースモデル 599 USD、Pro 版 799 USD。
- 先行予約(IndieGoGo)では限定数量で割引価格にて提供、ベース 399 USD、Pro 529 USD が目安。
- 予約は 2 月に開始予定。

- **その他**
- 製品仕様はオープンに情報共有されており、コミュニティ参加が歓迎されている。
- 需要が集中すれば、予約開始後数日で完売する可能性がある。

このタブレットは、ハードウェアレベルでのプライバシー制御とオープンな拡張性を求めるユーザーに向けた、Linux と Android のハイブリッドデバイスとして注目されている。
Brax Technologies just announced "a privacy-focused alternative to locked-down tablets" called open_slate that can double as a consumer tablet and a Linux-capable workstation on ARM. Earlier Brax Technologies built the privacy-focused smartphone BraX3, which co-founder Plamen Todorov says proved "a privacy-focused mobile device could be designed, crowdfunded, manufactured, and delivered outside the traditional Big Tech ecosystem." Just as importantly, BraX3 showed us the value of building with the community. The feedback we received — what worked, what didn't, and what people wanted next — played a major role in shaping our direction going forward. Today, we're ready to share the next step in that journey... They're promising their "2-in-1" open_slate tablet will be built with these guiding principles: Modularity beyond repairability". ("In addition to a user-replaceable battery, it supports an M.2 expansion slot, allowing users to customize storage and configurations to better fit their needs.") Hardware-level privacy and control, with physical switches allowing users to disable key components like wireless radios, sensors, microphones, and cameras. Multi-OS compatibility, supporting "multiple" Android-based operating systems as well as native Linux distributions. ("We're working with partners and the community to ensure proper, long-term OS support rather than one-off ports.") Longevity by design — a tablet that's "supported over time" Brax has already created an open thread with preliminary design specs. "The planned retail price is 599$ for the base version and 799$ for the Pro version," they write. "We will be offering open_slate (both versions) at a discount during our pre-order campaign, starting as low as 399$ for the base version and 529$ for the Pro version for limited quantities only which may sell out in a day or two from launching pre-orders... "Pre-orders will open in February, via IndieGoGo. Make sure to subscribe for notifications if you don't want to miss the launch date." Thanks to long-time Slashdot reader walterbyrd for sharing the news.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

KDE's 'Plasma Login Manager' Stops Supporting FreeBSD - Because Systemd

2026年1月26日 11:04

🤖 AI Summary

KDE の新しい「Plasma Login Manager」は、FreeBSD でのサポートを取りやめることが決定しました。

- KDE エンジニアがマージしたパッチにより、ログインマネージャが **systemd / logind** にハード依存していることが明らかに。FreeBSD には systemd が標準で搭載されていないため、機能しないことが理由です。
- ただし、KDE Plasma デスクトップ自体は引き続き FreeBSD で利用可能です。代替のログインマネージャとして、従来から使われている **SDDM** が問題なく動作します。
- 記事は「FreeBSD ユーザーは他にも多くのログインマネージャがあるので、特に不便は感じないだろう」と結んでいます。

要するに、Plasma Login Manager のみが FreeBSD を対象外にされたが、KDE 環境全体の利用や他のログインマネージャへの切り替えは可能である、ということです。
KDE's "Plasma Login Manager" is apparently dropping support for FreeBSD, the Unix-like operating system, reports the blog It's FOSS. They cite a recently-accepted merge request from a KDE engineer to drop the code supporting FreeBSD, since the login manager relies on systemd/logind: systemd and logind look like hard dependencies of the login manager, which means the software is built to work exclusively with these components and cannot function without them... logind is a component of systemd that is responsible for user session management... This doesn't mean that KDE has abandoned the operating system altogether. FreeBSD users can still run the KDE Plasma desktop environment and continue using SDDM, the current login manager that works just fine on such systems. The article argues FreeBSD users "won't really care much for missing out on this as they have plenty of login manager options available."

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Washington State May Mandate 'Firearm Blueprint Detection Algorithms' For 3D Printers

2026年1月26日 10:04

🤖 AI Summary

**ワシントン州で3Dプリンターに“設計図検出アルゴリズム”の導入が検討中**

ワシントン州議会は、HB 2320・HB 2321という法案を提出し、3DプリンターやCNC工作機械に対し「銃器設計図検出アルゴリズム」の搭載を義務付けようとしている。具体的には、印刷・加工ファイルを全てスキャンし、州が管理するデータベースと照合して、規制対象の設計(いわゆる“ゴーストガン”)が含まれる場合は出力をブロックする仕組みだ。

- **目的**:追跡不能な自作銃(ゴーストガン)の製造を防止すること。
- **実装方法**:ソフトウェアがファイルを解析し、政府のブラックリストと比較。高度なユーザーが回避する手段も想定している。
- **批判点**
- 法律文言が過度に広く、実装が技術的に困難。
- オープンソースや自由な設計共有を阻害し、製造業者に対してクラウドロックやサブスクリプション型のDRMを強いる恐れ。
- 実際の犯罪抑止効果は限定的で、普通の製造装置が規制対象になる点で連邦検察官も懸念を示す。

賛成派は公共の安全確保を訴える一方、反対派は技術的・自由主義的観点から過剰規制とみなし、産業やオープンソースコミュニティへの悪影響を指摘している。現在、法案は審議段階にある。
Adafruit managing director Phillip Torrone (also long-time Slashdot reader ptorrone ) writes: Washington State lawmakers are proposing bills (HB 2320 and HB 2321) that would require 3D printers and CNC machines to block certain designs using software-based "firearms blueprint detection algorithms." In practice, this means scanning every print file, comparing it against a government-maintained database, and preventing "skilled users" from bypassing the system. Supporters frame this as a response to untraceable "ghost guns," but even federal prosecutors admit the tools involved are ordinary manufacturing equipment. Critics warn the language is overbroad, technically unworkable, hostile to open source, and likely to push printing toward cloud-locked, subscription-based systems—while doing little to stop criminals.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Google Discover Replaces News Headlines With Sometimes Inaccurate AI-Generated Alternatives

2026年1月26日 09:04

🤖 AI Summary

Google Discover がニュース記事の見出しを、AI が自動生成したクリックベイト風の文に置き換える機能を本格化させました。Google はこれを「トレンドトピック」としてユーザー満足度が高いと主張していますが、実際には事実と異なる情報や文脈を誤って伝える見出しが多数報告されており、PC Magazine や Ars Technica などの出版者は「誤情報が拡散される」「AI の見出しは信頼できない」と強く批判しています。AI 生成の見出しには「Generated with AI, which can make mistakes」という注意文が「もっと見る」ボタンの裏に隠され、読者に出版社が意図した見出しと誤認させる恐れがあります。Google はインタビューの要請を拒否し、実装の詳細や誤情報防止策については明らかにしていません。
An anonymous reader shared this report from The Verge: In early December, I brought you the news that Google has begun replacing Verge headlines, and those of our competitors, with AI clickbait nonsense in its content feed [which appears on the leftmost homescreen page of many Android phones and the Google app's homepage]. Google appeared to be backing away from the experiment, but now tells The Verge that its AI headlines in Google Discover are a feature, one that "performs well for user satisfaction." I once again see lots of misleading claims every time I check my phone... For example, Google's AI claimed last week that "US reverses foreign drone ban," citing and linking to this PCMag story for the news. That's not just false — PCMag took pains to explain that it's false in the story that Google links to...! What does the author of that PCMag story think? "It makes me feel icky," Jim Fisher tells me over the phone. "I'd encourage people to click on stories and read them, and not trust what Google is spoon-feeding them." He says Google should be using the headline that humans wrote, and if Google needs a summary, it can use the ones that publications already submit to help search engines parse our work. Google claims it's not rewriting headlines. It characterizes these new offerings as "trending topics," even though each "trending topic" presents itself as one of our stories, links to our stories, and uses our images, all without competent fact-checking to ensure the AI is getting them right... The AI is also no longer restricted to roughly four words per headline, so I no longer see nonsense headlines like "Microsoft developers using AI" or "AI tag debate heats." (Instead, I occasionally see tripe like "Fares: Need AAA & AA Games" or "Dispatch sold millions; few avoided romance.") But Google's AI has no clue what parts of these stories are new, relevant, significant, or true, and it can easily confuse one story for another. On December 26th, Google told me that "Steam Machine price & HDMI details emerge." They hadn't. On January 11th, Google proclaimed that "ASUS ROG Ally X arrives." (It arrived in 2024; the new Xbox Ally arrived months ago.) On January 20th, it wrote that "Glasses-free 3D tech wows," introducing readers to "New 3D tech called Immensity from Leia" — but linking to this TechRadar story about an entirely different company called Visual Semiconductor... Google declined our request for an interview to more fully explain the idea. The site Android Police spotted more inaccurate headlines in December: A story from 9to5Google, which was actually titled 'Don't buy a Qi2 25W wireless charger hoping for faster speeds — just get the 'slower' one instead' was retitled as 'Qi2 slows older Pixels.' Similarly, Ars Technica's 'Valve's Steam Machine looks like a console, but don't expect it to be priced like one' was changed to 'Steam Machine price revealed.' At the time, we believed that the inaccuracies were due to the feature being unstable and in early testing.... Now, Google has stopped calling Discover replacing human-written headlines as an "experiment." "Google buries a 'Generated with AI, which can make mistakes' message under the 'See more' button in the summary," reports 9to5Google, "making it look like this is the publisher's intended headline." While it is obvious that Google has refined this feature over the past couple of months, it doesn't take long to still find plenty of misleading headlines throughout Discover... Another article from NotebookCheck about an Anker power bank with a retractable cable was given a headline that's about another product entirely. A pair of headlines from Tom's Hardware and PCMag, meanwhile, show the two sides of using AI for this purpose. The Tom's Hardware headline, "Free GPU & Amazon Scams," isn't representative of the actual article, which is about someone who bought a GPU from Amazon, canceled their order, and the retailer shipped it anyway. There's nothing about "Amazon Scams" in the article.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

❌